These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1369 related items for PubMed ID: 24640441

  • 61. A two-year comparison of resin-based composite tunnel and Class II restorations in a randomized controlled trial.
    Kinomoto Y, Inoue Y, Ebisu S.
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 15478486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 62.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 63. Double-blind randomized clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 6-month follow-up.
    Coelho-de-Souza FH, Klein-Júnior CA, Camargo JC, Beskow T, Balestrin MD, Demarco FF.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Mar 01; 11(2):001-8. PubMed ID: 20228981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 64.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 65.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 66.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 67.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 68.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 69. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays compared to composite restorations.
    Lange RT, Pfeiffer P.
    Oper Dent; 2009 Mar 01; 34(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 19544814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 70. The marginal seal of a flowable composite, an injectable resin modified glass ionomer and a compomer in primary molars--an in vitro study.
    Prabhakar AR, Madan M, Raju OS.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Jun 01; 21(2):45-8. PubMed ID: 14700335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 71.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 72. Adhesion of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements may affect the integrity of tooth structure in the open sandwich technique.
    Czarnecka B, Kruszelnicki A, Kao A, Strykowska M, Nicholson JW.
    Dent Mater; 2014 Dec 01; 30(12):e301-5. PubMed ID: 24950810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 73. Clinical and radiographic assessment of Class II esthetic restorations in primary molars.
    Fuks AB, Araujo FB, Osorio LB, Hadani PE, Pinto AS.
    Pediatr Dent; 2000 Dec 01; 22(6):479-85. PubMed ID: 11132507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 74. Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets.
    Oginni AO, Adeleke AA.
    J Dent; 2014 Jul 01; 42(7):824-30. PubMed ID: 24746714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 75. Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth. A retrospective evaluation.
    Croll TP, Bar-Zion Y, Segura A, Donly KJ.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Aug 01; 132(8):1110-6. PubMed ID: 11575018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 76. In vitro Comparative Evaluation of Various Restorative Materials used for restoring Class III Cavities in Deciduous Anterior Teeth: A Clinical Study.
    Priyank H, Verma A, Gupta K, Chaudhary E, Khandelwal D, Nihalani S.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Dec 01; 17(12):1022-1026. PubMed ID: 27965491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 77. Reliability of different techniques to assess marginal defects of Class II restorations in retrieved primary molars: a visual-tactile, SEM, dye penetration and polarized light microscopy study.
    Fuks AB, Araujo FB, Donly KJ, Cervantes M.
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2002 Oct 01; 19(4):6-16, 67. PubMed ID: 12510251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 78. Class II restorations in primary teeth: 7-year study on three resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer.
    Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT.
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2004 Apr 01; 112(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 15056118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 79. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD, Ozcan M.
    J Dent; 2014 Nov 01; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 80. Posterior composite restorations in primary molars: an in vivo comparison of three restorative techniques.
    Rastelli FP, de Sousa Vieira R, Rastelli MC.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001 Nov 01; 25(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 12049083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 69.