These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

173 related items for PubMed ID: 2464806

  • 1. Usefulness of rate responsive atrial pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
    Hatano K, Kato R, Hayashi H, Noda S, Sotobata I, Murase M.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Jan; 12(1 Pt 1):16-24. PubMed ID: 2464806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Rate adaptive pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects of pacing modes and intrinsic conduction on physiological responses, arrhythmias, symptomatology and quality of life.
    Lau CP, Tai YT, Leung WH, Wong CK, Lee P, Chung FL.
    Eur Heart J; 1994 Nov; 15(11):1445-55. PubMed ID: 7835358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Use of automatic mode change between DDD and AAI to facilitate native atrioventricular conduction in patients with sick sinus syndrome or transient atrioventricular block.
    Mayumi H, Kohno H, Yasui H, Kawachi Y, Tokunaga K.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1740-7. PubMed ID: 8945033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Influence of the pacing rate on the atrioventricular conduction time during aerobic and anaerobic exercise: basic concepts for a dromotropically controlled rate responsive pacemaker.
    Meine M, Hexamer M, Werner J, Israel CW, Mügge A, Lemke B, Barmeyer J.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Dec; 22(12):1782-91. PubMed ID: 10642132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. AAI pacing mode: when is it indicated and how should it be achieved?
    Katritsis D, Camm AJ.
    Clin Cardiol; 1993 Apr; 16(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 8458114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
    Occhetta E, Perucca A, Fazzari M, Pistis G, Baduini G, Trevi G.
    Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Atrial pacing for sick sinus syndrome.
    Rosenqvist M.
    Clin Cardiol; 1990 Jan; 13(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 2404646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Atrial adaptive rate pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects on exercise capacity and arrhythmias.
    Haywood GA, Katritsis D, Ward J, Leigh-Jones M, Ward DE, Camm AJ.
    Br Heart J; 1993 Feb; 69(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8435244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life].
    Epperlein S, Kreft A, Siegert V, Liebrich A, Himmrich E, Treese N.
    Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A new principle of rate adaptive pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
    Irnich W, Conrady J.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1823-8. PubMed ID: 2463553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Determination of the optimal atrioventricular interval in sick sinus syndrome during DDD pacing.
    Kato M, Dote K, Sasaki S, Goto K, Takemoto H, Habara S, Hasegawa D, Matsuda O.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Sep; 28(9):892-7. PubMed ID: 16176525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The chronotropic response of the sinus node to exercise: a new method of analysis and a study of pacemaker patients.
    Crook B, Nijhof P, van der Kemp P, Jennison C.
    Eur Heart J; 1995 Jul; 16(7):993-8. PubMed ID: 7498217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in patients with impaired sinus node chronotropy: an echocardiographic and cardiopulmonary study.
    Vardas PE, Simantirakis EN, Parthenakis FI, Chrysostomakis SI, Skalidis EI, Zuridakis EG.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 20(7):1762-8. PubMed ID: 9249829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Relationship between atrioventricular delay and oxygen consumption in patients with sick sinus syndrome: relevance to rate responsive pacing.
    Meine M, Hexamer M, Werner J, Israel CW, Lemke B, Barmeyer J.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Jul; 22(7):1054-63. PubMed ID: 10456634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Stability of AV conduction in sick sinus node syndrome patients with implanted atrial pacemakers.
    Hayes DL, Furman S.
    Am Heart J; 1984 Apr; 107(4):644-7. PubMed ID: 6702557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Benefits of dual chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome.
    Mitsuoka T, Kenny RA, Yeung TA, Chan SL, Perrins JE, Sutton R.
    Br Heart J; 1988 Oct; 60(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 3056477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Chronotropic response of an activity detecting pacemaker compared with the normal sinus node.
    Moura PJ, Gessman LJ, Lai T, Gallagher JD, White M, Morse DP.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 Jan; 10(1 Pt 1):78-86. PubMed ID: 2436172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Atrioventricular conduction and permanent atrial pacing].
    Medzevicius A, Medzeviciene V.
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2002 Jan; 38(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12474716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Benefits of rate-responsive pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
    Nishino M, Ito T, Miyawaki M, Nakagawa T, Kuryu T, Tanahashi H, Yamada Y, Abe H.
    Angiology; 1994 May; 45(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 8172382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Incidence and significance of chronotropic incompetence in patients with indications for primary pacemaker implantation or pacemaker replacement.
    Lukl J, Doupal V, Sovová E, Lubena L.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Sep; 22(9):1284-91. PubMed ID: 10527009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.