These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. The economic value of primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim in patients with breast cancer in the UK. Liu Z, Doan QV, Malin J, Leonard R. Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2009; 7(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 19799473 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer after chemotherapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis for Germany]. Sehouli J, Goertz A, Steinle T, Dubois R, Plesnila-Frank C, Lalla A, von Minckwitz G. Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 Mar; 135(9):385-9. PubMed ID: 20180162 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States. Lyman G, Lalla A, Barron R, Dubois RW. Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Feb; 25(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 19192985 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Routine Primary Prophylaxis for Febrile Neutropenia with Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (Nivestim) or Pegfilgrastim Is Cost Effective in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients undergoing Curative-Intent R-CHOP Chemotherapy. Wang XJ, Tang T, Farid M, Quek R, Tao M, Lim ST, Wee HL, Chan A. PLoS One; 2016 Feb; 11(2):e0148901. PubMed ID: 26871584 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer in Taiwan. Tseng TH, Chiang SC, Hsu JC, Ko Y. PLoS One; 2024 Feb; 19(6):e0303294. PubMed ID: 38857244 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients receiving FEC-D. Lee EK, Wong WW, Trudeau ME, Chan KK. Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Feb; 150(1):169-80. PubMed ID: 25694355 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus six days of filgrastim for preventing febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients. Danova M, Chiroli S, Rosti G, Doan QV. Tumori; 2009 Feb; 95(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 19579869 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Pegfilgrastim for the prevention of febrile neutropenia in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma--a cost-effectiveness analysis. Numnum TM, Kimball KJ, Rocconi RP, Kilgore LC, Straughn JM. Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2007 Feb; 17(5):1019-24. PubMed ID: 17386043 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) for the prevention of febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients with cancer. Aapro MS, Chaplin S, Cornes P, Howe S, Link H, Koptelova N, Mehl A, Di Palma M, Schroader BK, Terkola R. Support Care Cancer; 2023 Sep 20; 31(10):581. PubMed ID: 37728795 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim primary prophylaxis in women with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy in the United States. Lyman GH, Lalla A, Barron RL, Dubois RW. Clin Ther; 2009 May 20; 31(5):1092-104. PubMed ID: 19539110 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of primary versus secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim in women with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy. Ramsey SD, Liu Z, Boer R, Sullivan SD, Malin J, Doan QV, Dubois RW, Lyman GH. Value Health; 2009 May 20; 12(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 18673353 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy, effectiveness and safety of long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with cancer: a systematic review. Pfeil AM, Allcott K, Pettengell R, von Minckwitz G, Schwenkglenks M, Szabo Z. Support Care Cancer; 2015 Feb 20; 23(2):525-45. PubMed ID: 25284721 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]