These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

211 related items for PubMed ID: 24658257

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Evaluation of an algorithm for the assessment of the MTF using an edge method.
    Greer PB, van Doorn T.
    Med Phys; 2000 Sep; 27(9):2048-59. PubMed ID: 11011732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Step by step analysis toward optimal MTF algorithm using an edge test device.
    Donovan M, Zhang D, Liu H.
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2009 Sep; 17(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 19644210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Assessing the validity of modulation transfer function evaluation techniques with application to small area and scanned digital detectors.
    Price BD, Esbrand CJ, Olivo A, Gibson AP, Hebden JC, Speller RD, Royle GJ.
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2008 Nov; 79(11):113103. PubMed ID: 19045885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Ray contribution masks for structure adaptive sinogram filtering.
    Balda M, Hornegger J, Heismann B.
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Jun; 31(6):1228-39. PubMed ID: 22333988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Modulation transfer function for a large-area amorphous silicon image receptor.
    Earnhart JR, Chaney EL.
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Dec; 42(12):2531-40. PubMed ID: 9434305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Techniques to improve the accuracy and to reduce the variance in noise power spectrum measurement.
    Jiang H, Chen WR, Liu H.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Nov; 49(11):1270-8. PubMed ID: 12450357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Effect of noise on MTF calculations using different phantoms.
    González-López A.
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1889-1898. PubMed ID: 29500817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Efficient x-ray image enhancement algorithm using image fusion.
    Shen K, Wen Y, Cai Y.
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2009 May; 17(3):207-20. PubMed ID: 19893213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Development and application of programs to measure modulation transfer function, noise power spectrum and detective quantum efficiency.
    Padgett R, Kotre CJ.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 May; 117(1-3):283-7. PubMed ID: 16461517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Interventional 4D motion estimation and reconstruction of cardiac vasculature without motion periodicity assumption.
    Rohkohl C, Lauritsch G, Biller L, Prümmer M, Boese J, Hornegger J.
    Med Image Anal; 2010 Oct; 14(5):687-94. PubMed ID: 20573539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems.
    Marshall NW, Monnin P, Bosmans H, Bochud FO, Verdun FR.
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul 21; 56(14):4201-20. PubMed ID: 21701051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.