These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


266 related items for PubMed ID: 24673517

  • 1. The Ipswich Touch Test: a simple and novel method to screen patients with diabetes at home for increased risk of foot ulceration.
    Sharma S, Kerry C, Atkins H, Rayman G.
    Diabet Med; 2014 Sep; 31(9):1100-3. PubMed ID: 24673517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Utilizing the Ipswich Touch Test to simplify screening methods for identifying the risk of foot ulceration among diabetics: The Saudi experience.
    Madanat A, Sheshah E, Badawy el-B, Abbas A, Al-Bakheet A.
    Prim Care Diabetes; 2015 Aug; 9(4):304-6. PubMed ID: 25466160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A pocket-sized disposable device for testing the integrity of sensation in the outpatient setting.
    Bowling FL, Abbott CA, Harris WE, Atanasov S, Malik RA, Boulton AJ.
    Diabet Med; 2012 Dec; 29(12):1550-2. PubMed ID: 22672290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The Ipswich Touch Test: a simple and novel method to identify inpatients with diabetes at risk of foot ulceration.
    Rayman G, Vas PR, Baker N, Taylor CG, Gooday C, Alder AI, Donohoe M.
    Diabetes Care; 2011 Jul; 34(7):1517-8. PubMed ID: 21593300
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Pilot study on the significance of random intrasite placement of the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament.
    Slater RA, Koren S, Ramot Y, Buchs A, Rapoport MJ.
    Diabetes Metab Res Rev; 2013 Mar; 29(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 23283830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. ACP Journal Club: the Ipswich Touch Test at home had 78% sensitivity and 94% specificity for detecting loss of foot sensation.
    O'Loughlin A, Dinneen SF.
    Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb 17; 162(4):JC10. PubMed ID: 25686185
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Screening for the loss of protective sensation in people without a history of diabetic foot ulceration: Validation of two simple tests in India.
    Chatzistergos PE, Kumar S, Sumathi CS, Mahadevan S, Vas P, Chockalingam N.
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2023 Aug 17; 202():110810. PubMed ID: 37391033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Possible sources of discrepancies in the use of the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament. Impact on prevalence of insensate foot and workload requirements.
    McGill M, Molyneaux L, Spencer R, Heng LF, Yue DK.
    Diabetes Care; 1999 Apr 17; 22(4):598-602. PubMed ID: 10189538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Computer-assisted measurement in diabetic patients with and without foot ulceration.
    Tassler PL, Dellon AL, Scheffler NM.
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 1995 Nov 17; 85(11):679-84. PubMed ID: 8537899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. An alternative to a 10-g monofilament or tuning fork? Two new, simple, easy-to-use screening tests for determining foot ulcer risk in people with diabetes.
    Baker N.
    Diabet Med; 2012 Dec 17; 29(12):1477-9. PubMed ID: 22686252
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Diabetic neuropathy and foot complications.
    Boulton AJ.
    Handb Clin Neurol; 2014 Dec 17; 126():97-107. PubMed ID: 25410217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Reliability and responsiveness of an 18 site, 10-g monofilament examination for assessment of protective foot sensation.
    Young D, Schuerman S, Flynn K, Hartig K, Moss D, Altenburger B.
    J Geriatr Phys Ther; 2011 Dec 17; 34(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 21937899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Sensitivity and specificity of a utility model of the detection of diabetic neuropathy].
    Mendoza-Romo MA, Ramírez-Arriola MC, Velasco-Chávez JF, Nieva-de Jesús RN, Rodríguez-Pérez CV, Valdez-Jiménez LA.
    Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2013 Dec 17; 51(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 23550406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Sensory thresholds of normal human feet.
    Jeng C, Michelson J, Mizel M.
    Foot Ankle Int; 2000 Jun 17; 21(6):501-4. PubMed ID: 10884110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.