These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

194 related items for PubMed ID: 24676669

  • 1. Preference pulses without reinforcers.
    McLean AP, Grace RC, Pitts RC, Hughes CE.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):317-36. PubMed ID: 24676669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. How do reinforcers affect choice? Preference pulses after responses and reinforcers.
    Gomes-Ng S, Elliffe D, Cowie S.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Jul; 108(1):17-38. PubMed ID: 28573713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.
    Landon J, Davison M, Elliffe D.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 12083679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.
    Beeby E, Alsop B.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):204-222. PubMed ID: 28758210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Local preference in concurrent schedules: the effects of reinforcer sequences.
    Krägeloh CU, Davison M, Elliffe DM.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 16156136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effects of intertrial reinforcers on self-control choice.
    Mazur JE.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Jan; 61(1):83-96. PubMed ID: 8126393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Some effects of overall rate of earning reinforcers on run lengths and visit durations.
    Macdonall JS.
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jul; 73(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 16530983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The effects of changeover delays on local choice.
    Gomes-Ng S, Landon J, Elliffe D, Bensemann J, Cowie S.
    Behav Processes; 2018 May; 150():36-46. PubMed ID: 29499344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Concurrent schedules: reinforcer magnitude effects.
    Landon J, Davison M, Elliffe D.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 May; 79(3):351-65. PubMed ID: 12908762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Preference and resistance to change with constant- and variable-duration terminal links: independence of reinforcement rate and magnitude.
    Grace RC, Bedell MA, Nevin JA.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):233-55. PubMed ID: 12083678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Preference reversal between impulsive and self-control choice.
    Beeby E, White KG.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 May; 99(3):260-76. PubMed ID: 23440893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Four-alternative choice violates the constant-ratio rule.
    Elliffe D, Davison M.
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):381-9. PubMed ID: 19941942
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Steady-state choice between four alternatives obeys the constant-ratio rule.
    Bensemann J, Lobb B, Podlesnik CA, Elliffe D.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jul; 104(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 25989016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Examining the discriminative and strengthening effects of reinforcers in concurrent schedules.
    Boutros N, Elliffe D, Davison M.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Sep; 96(2):227-41. PubMed ID: 21909166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of free food deliveries and temporal contiguity on choice under concurrent-chain schedules.
    Scoones C, Hucks A, McLean AP, Grace RC.
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Aug; 16(4):736-41. PubMed ID: 19648461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Fix and sample with rats in the dynamics of choice.
    Aparicio CF, Baum WM.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):43-63. PubMed ID: 16903492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Choice in a variable environment: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement.
    Rodewald AM, Hughes CE, Pitts RC.
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):460-4. PubMed ID: 20188157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.
    Davison M, Baum WM.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jul; 80(1):95-129. PubMed ID: 13677611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Deviations from matching as a measure of preference for alternatives in pigeons.
    Leigland SM.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Jul; 32(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 490100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. On the joint control of preference by time and reinforcer-ratio variation.
    Davison M, Cowie S, Elliffe D.
    Behav Processes; 2013 May; 95():100-12. PubMed ID: 23410902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.