These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
194 related items for PubMed ID: 24676669
21. Strict and random alternation in concurrent variable-interval schedules. Elliffe D, Davison M. J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan; 79(1):65-85. PubMed ID: 12696742 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Choice between delayed reinforcers in a discrete-trials schedule: the effect of deprivation level. Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E. Q J Exp Psychol B; 1992 Jan; 44(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 1546183 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of schedule type and terminal-link duration on choice in concurrent chains. Grace RC, McLean AP. J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Sep; 112(2):192-209. PubMed ID: 31407355 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A test of the melioration theory of matching. Williams BA, Royalty P. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1989 Apr; 15(2):99-113. PubMed ID: 2708942 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Are preference and resistance to change convergent expressions of stimulus value? Podlesnik CA, Jimenez-Gomez C, Shahan TA. J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Jul; 100(1):27-48. PubMed ID: 23720141 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Choice, time and food: continuous cyclical changes in food probability between reinforcers. Miranda-Dukoski L, Davison M, Elliffe D. J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):406-21. PubMed ID: 24615528 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent schedules: effects of reinforcement amount. Maguire DR, Hughes CE, Pitts RC. Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 17416469 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Choice between contingencies of variation: effects of the requirement of variation upon preference. Pontes TN, Abreu-Rodrigues J, Souza AS. Behav Processes; 2012 Nov; 91(3):214-22. PubMed ID: 22960371 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Preference pulses and the win-stay, fix-and-sample model of choice. Hachiga Y, Sakagami T, Silberberg A. J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Nov; 104(3):274-95. PubMed ID: 26420769 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Reinforcement omission in concurrent fixed-interval and random-interval schedules. Ishii T, Sakagami T. Behav Processes; 2007 Mar; 74(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 17275211 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Concurrent-chains schedules as a method to study choice between alcohol-associated conditioned reinforcers. Jimenez-Gomez C, Shahan TA. J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Jan; 97(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 22287805 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Relative and absolute reinforcement frequency as determinants of choice in concurrent variable interval schedules. Shah K, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E. Q J Exp Psychol B; 1991 Feb; 43(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 2017573 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Choice and conditioned reinforcement. Fantino E, Freed D, Preston RA, Williams WA. J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Mar; 55(2):177-88. PubMed ID: 2037826 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]