These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
121 related items for PubMed ID: 2468141
21. The chronotropic response of the sinus node to exercise: a new method of analysis and a study of pacemaker patients. Crook B, Nijhof P, van der Kemp P, Jennison C. Eur Heart J; 1995 Jul; 16(7):993-8. PubMed ID: 7498217 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Physiological benefits of a pacemaker with dual chamber pacing at low heart rates and single chamber rate responsive pacing during exercise. French WJ, Haskell RJ, Wesley GW, Florio J. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1840-5. PubMed ID: 2463556 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Changes in QT and Q-aT intervals induced by mental and physical stress with fixed rate and atrial triggered ventricular inhibited cardiac pacing. Hedman A, Nordlander R. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Oct; 11(10):1426-31. PubMed ID: 2462219 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Maintaining physiological pacing in AV block using a new generation single lead VDD pacemaker. Lau C, Nishimura SC, Harrison AW, Goldman BS. Can J Cardiol; 1996 Jun; 12(6):579-83. PubMed ID: 8665420 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of heart rate on the working capacity of patients with complete heart block and physiological pacemaker. Lukl J, Heinc P. Cor Vasa; 1991 Jun; 33(6):506-13. PubMed ID: 1842943 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Rate-responsive ventricular pacing: clinical experience with the RS4-SRT pacing system. Ramsdale DR, Charles RG. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1985 May; 8(3 Pt 1):378-86. PubMed ID: 2582386 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Pacemakers of the 1980s. An overview. Sukhum P. Postgrad Med; 1986 Mar; 79(4):173-4, 177-83, 186-8. PubMed ID: 3952041 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical experience with Sensolog 703: a new activity sensing rate responsive pacemaker. Lau CP, Tse WS, Camm AJ. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Oct; 11(10):1444-55. PubMed ID: 2462222 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of rate-responsive pacemakers by transesophageal Holter monitoring of spontaneous atrial rate. Bongiorni MG, Soldati E, Paperini L, Pozzolini A, Levorato D, Arena G, Pistelli P, Quirino G, Biagini A, Contini C. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1755-60. PubMed ID: 1704536 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of continuously recorded sensor and sinus rates during daily life activities and standardized exercise testing: efficacy of automatically optimized rate adaptive dual sensor pacing to simulate sinus rhythm. Lau CP, Leung SK, Guerola M, Crijns HJ. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1672-7. PubMed ID: 8945022 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life]. Epperlein S, Kreft A, Siegert V, Liebrich A, Himmrich E, Treese N. Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Atrial sensing performance of the single-lead VDD pacemaker during exercise. Varriale P, Chryssos BE. J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Dec; 22(7):1854-7. PubMed ID: 8245339 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Reliability of single-lead VDD atrial sensing and pacing during exercise. Guyomar Y, Graux P, Carlioz R, Moulin C, Dutoit A. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Dec; 22(12):1747-52. PubMed ID: 10642127 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Rate-responsive pacing by means of activity sensing versus single rate ventricular pacing: a double-blind cross-over study. Smedgård P, Kristensson BE, Kruse I, Ryden L. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 Jul; 10(4 Pt 1):902-15. PubMed ID: 2441374 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. ["QT" pacemaker in aggregate exchange. Do old electrodes impair functional ability?]. Sigmund M, Schwindke P, Recker S, Johnen A, Hanrath P. Z Kardiol; 1991 Mar; 80(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 2058250 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Efficacy and safety of bipolar sensing with high atrial sensitivity in dual chamber pacemakers. Wiegand UK, Bode F, Peters W, Haase H, Bonnemeier H, Katus HA, Potratz J. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Apr; 23(4 Pt 1):427-33. PubMed ID: 10793429 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Multicenter clinical evaluation of a new SSIR pacemaker. Bongiorni MG, Soldati E, Arena G, de Simone L, Capucci A, Galli R, Parlapiano M, Cazzin R, Moracchini P, Leonardi C. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):1798-803. PubMed ID: 1279550 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Delayed exercise rate response kinetics due to sensor cross-checking in a dual sensor rate adaptive pacing system: the importance of individual sensor programming. Lau CP, Leung SK, Lee IS. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Jul; 19(7):1021-5. PubMed ID: 8823827 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Shortening the stimulus T time: indicator for physical activity in patients with demand modulated cardiac pacemakers]. Schuchert A, Kuck KH. Z Kardiol; 1993 Jun; 82(6):358-61. PubMed ID: 8351941 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. VDD(R) pacing: short- and long-term stability of atrial sensing with a single lead system. Naegeli B, Osswald S, Pfisterer M, Burkart F. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Apr; 19(4 Pt 1):455-64. PubMed ID: 8848393 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]