These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

417 related items for PubMed ID: 24686901

  • 1. Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.
    Ji C, Galvin JJ, Chang YP, Xu A, Fu QJ.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Apr 01; 57(2):532-54. PubMed ID: 24686901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE, Wang LM.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr 15; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S, Jürgens T, Brand T, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Apr 15; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC, Pogue J, Milrany T.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Apr 15; 23(7):501-9. PubMed ID: 22992257
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Intelligibility of Noise-Adapted and Clear Speech in Energetic and Informational Maskers for Native and Nonnative Listeners.
    Meemann K, Smiljanić R.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Apr 04; 65(4):1263-1281. PubMed ID: 35235410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Nonnative Accent Discrimination with Words and Sentences.
    Atagi E, Bent T.
    Phonetica; 2017 Apr 04; 74(3):173-191. PubMed ID: 28268232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Second-language experience and speech-in-noise recognition: effects of talker-listener accent similarity.
    Pinet M, Iverson P, Huckvale M.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep 04; 130(3):1653-62. PubMed ID: 21895102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cochlear Implant Facilitates the Use of Talker Sex and Spatial Cues to Segregate Competing Speech in Unilaterally Deaf Listeners.
    Chen J, Shi Y, Kong Y, Chen B, Zhang L, Galvin JJ, Li Y, Fu QJ.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Sep 04; 44(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 35733275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB, Riss D, Liepins R, Rader T, Keck T, Keintzel T, Kaider A, Baumgartner WD, Gstoettner W, Arnoldner C.
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul 04; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The Perception of Regional Dialects and Foreign Accents by Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tamati TN, Pisoni DB, Moberly AC.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Feb 17; 64(2):683-690. PubMed ID: 33493399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit.
    Bent T, Bradlow AR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep 17; 114(3):1600-10. PubMed ID: 14514213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of speaking rate on recognition of synthetic and natural speech by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Ji C, Galvin JJ, Xu A, Fu QJ.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep 17; 34(3):313-23. PubMed ID: 23238527
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Accent Intelligibility Differences in Noise Across Native and Nonnative Accents: Effects of Talker-Listener Pairing at Acoustic-Phonetic and Lexical Levels.
    Stringer L, Iverson P.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jul 15; 62(7):2213-2226. PubMed ID: 31251681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effects of noise, reverberation and foreign accent on native and non-native listeners' performance of English speech comprehension.
    Peng ZE, Wang LM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May 15; 139(5):2772. PubMed ID: 27250170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native talkers.
    van Wijngaarden SJ, Steeneken HJ, Houtgast T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec 15; 112(6):3004-13. PubMed ID: 12509022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effects of Listener Age and Native Language Experience on Recognition of Accented and Unaccented English Words.
    Gordon-Salant S, Yeni-Komshian GH, Bieber RE, Jara Ureta DA, Freund MS, Fitzgibbons PJ.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr 26; 62(4S):1131-1143. PubMed ID: 31026190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Behavioral characterization of the cochlear amplifier lesion due to loss of function of stereocilin (STRC) in human subjects.
    Benoit C, Carlson RJ, King MC, Horn DL, Rubinstein JT.
    Hear Res; 2023 Nov 26; 439():108898. PubMed ID: 37890241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Non-native talkers and listeners and the perceptual benefits of clear speech.
    Jung YJ, Dmitrieva O.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jan 26; 153(1):137. PubMed ID: 36732255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Speech rate, rate-matching, and intelligibility in early-implanted cochlear implant users.
    Freeman V, Pisoni DB.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug 26; 142(2):1043. PubMed ID: 28863583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Time-compression thresholds for Mandarin sentences in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Meng Q, Wang X, Cai Y, Kong F, Buck AN, Yu G, Zheng N, Schnupp JWH.
    Hear Res; 2019 Mar 15; 374():58-68. PubMed ID: 30732921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.