These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

911 related items for PubMed ID: 24706544

  • 1. Ultrasound simulator-assisted teaching of cardiac anatomy to preclinical anatomy students: A pilot randomized trial of a three-hour learning exposure.
    Canty DJ, Hayes JA, Story DA, Royse CF.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 24706544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Ultrasound and cadaveric prosections as methods for teaching cardiac anatomy: a comparative study.
    Griksaitis MJ, Sawdon MA, Finn GM.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 22069248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Ultrasound-based teaching of cardiac anatomy and physiology to undergraduate medical students.
    Hammoudi N, Arangalage D, Boubrit L, Renaud MC, Isnard R, Collet JP, Cohen A, Duguet A.
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2013 Oct; 106(10):487-91. PubMed ID: 23911833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The translucent cadaver: a follow-up study to gauge the efficacy of implementing changes suggested by students.
    Kotzé SH, Driescher ND, Mole CG.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013 Oct; 6(6):433-9. PubMed ID: 23533087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Investigating the use of quick response codes in the gross anatomy laboratory.
    Traser CJ, Hoffman LA, Seifert MF, Wilson AB.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015 Oct; 8(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 25288343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The effect of simulation of sectional human anatomy using ultrasound on students' learning outcomes and satisfaction in echocardiography education: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
    Ding K, Chen M, Li P, Xie Z, Zhang H, Kou R, Xu J, Zou T, Luo Z, Song H.
    BMC Med Educ; 2024 May 03; 24(1):494. PubMed ID: 38702655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Analysis of traditional versus three-dimensional augmented curriculum on anatomical learning outcome measures.
    Peterson DC, Mlynarczyk GS.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov 03; 9(6):529-536. PubMed ID: 27078503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Perceptions of first-year medical students towards learning anatomy using cadaveric specimens through peer teaching.
    Agius A, Calleja N, Camenzuli C, Sultana R, Pullicino R, Zammit C, Calleja Agius J, Pomara C.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jul 03; 11(4):346-357. PubMed ID: 29112798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Impact of endovascular simulator training on vascular surgery as a career choice in medical students.
    Markovic J, Peyser C, Cavoores T, Fletcher E, Peterson D, Shortell C.
    J Vasc Surg; 2012 May 03; 55(5):1515-21. PubMed ID: 22464708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Cognitive load imposed by ultrasound-facilitated teaching does not adversely affect gross anatomy learning outcomes.
    Jamniczky HA, Cotton D, Paget M, Ramji Q, Lenz R, McLaughlin K, Coderre S, Ma IW.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar 03; 10(2):144-151. PubMed ID: 27533319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Creation and Global Deployment of a Mobile, Application-Based Cognitive Simulator for Cardiac Surgical Procedures.
    Brewer ZE, Ogden WD, Fann JI, Burdon TA, Sheikh AY.
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Mar 03; 28(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 27568126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Incorporating radiology into medical gross anatomy: does the use of cadaver CT scans improve students' academic performance in anatomy?
    Lufler RS, Zumwalt AC, Romney CA, Hoagland TM.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2010 Mar 03; 3(2):56-63. PubMed ID: 20213692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Medical student preferences for self-directed study resources in gross anatomy.
    Choi-Lundberg DL, Low TF, Patman P, Turner P, Sinha SN.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Mar 03; 9(2):150-60. PubMed ID: 26033851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Anatomy Learning from Prosected Cadaveric Specimens Versus Plastic Models: A Comparative Study of Upper Limb Anatomy.
    Mitrousias V, Karachalios TS, Varitimidis SE, Natsis K, Arvanitis DL, Zibis AH.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2020 Jul 03; 13(4):436-444. PubMed ID: 31251473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Factors influencing students' decisions to participate in a short "dissection experience" within a systemic anatomy course.
    Larkin TA, McAndrew DJ.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013 Jul 03; 6(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 23213067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Lecture recording system in anatomy: possible benefit to auditory learners.
    Bacro TR, Gebregziabher M, Ariail J.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013 Jul 03; 6(6):376-84. PubMed ID: 23508921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Human anatomy: let the students tell us how to teach.
    Davis CR, Bates AS, Ellis H, Roberts AM.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2014 Jul 03; 7(4):262-72. PubMed ID: 24249485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Contrast-enhanced cadaver-specific computed tomography in gross anatomy teaching.
    Paech D, Klopries K, Doll S, Nawrotzki R, Schlemmer HP, Giesel FL, Kuner T.
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul 03; 28(7):2838-2844. PubMed ID: 29383525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Online dissection audio-visual resources for human anatomy: Undergraduate medical students' usage and learning outcomes.
    Choi-Lundberg DL, Cuellar WA, Williams AM.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov 03; 9(6):545-554. PubMed ID: 27802370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. "Let's get physical": advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy.
    Preece D, Williams SB, Lam R, Weller R.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013 Nov 03; 6(4):216-24. PubMed ID: 23349117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 46.