These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

484 related items for PubMed ID: 24709031

  • 21. A systematic review of the quality of distal radius systematic reviews: Methodology and reporting assessment.
    Belloti JC, Okamura A, Scheeren J, Faloppa F, Ynoe de Moraes V.
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0206895. PubMed ID: 30673700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar.
    Tian J, Zhang J, Ge L, Yang K, Song F.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 May; 85():50-58. PubMed ID: 28063911
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Methodological quality of systematic reviews referenced in clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of opioid use disorder.
    Ross A, Rankin J, Beaman J, Murray K, Sinnett P, Riddle R, Haskins J, Vassar M.
    PLoS One; 2017 May; 12(8):e0181927. PubMed ID: 28771633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
    Dosenovic S, Jelicic Kadic A, Vucic K, Markovina N, Pieper D, Puljak L.
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May 08; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Reporting Characteristics and Quality of Systematic Reviews of Acupuncture Analgesia.
    Li X, Wang R, Shi X, Su J, Pan Y, Tian J, Yang K.
    Pain Pract; 2017 Nov 08; 17(8):1066-1074. PubMed ID: 28083991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews in orthodontics.
    Fleming PS, Seehra J, Polychronopoulou A, Fedorowicz Z, Pandis N.
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Jan 08; 83(1):158-63. PubMed ID: 22720835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Most systematic reviews of high methodological quality on psoriasis interventions are classified as high risk of bias using ROBIS tool.
    Gómez-García F, Ruano J, Gay-Mimbrera J, Aguilar-Luque M, Sanz-Cabanillas JL, Alcalde-Mellado P, Maestre-López B, Carmona-Fernández PJ, González-Padilla M, García-Nieto AV, Isla-Tejera B.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Dec 08; 92():79-88. PubMed ID: 28893571
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-analyses in Endodontics.
    Kattan S, Lee SM, Kohli MR, Setzer FC, Karabucak B.
    J Endod; 2018 Jan 08; 44(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 29032820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study.
    Chung VCH, Wu XY, Feng Y, Ho RST, Wong SYS, Threapleton D.
    Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2018 Dec 08; 27(6):619-627. PubMed ID: 28462754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.