These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

218 related items for PubMed ID: 24713566

  • 1. Comparative photoelastic study of dental and skeletal anchorages in the canine retraction.
    de Assis Claro CA, Chagas RV, Neves AC, da Silva-Concílio LR.
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 24713566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis.
    Sung SJ, Jang GW, Chun YS, Moon YS.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 20451784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
    Thiruvenkatachari B, Ammayappan P, Kandaswamy R.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
    Upadhyay M, Yadav S, Patil S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Three-dimensional modeling and finite element analysis in treatment planning for orthodontic tooth movement.
    Ammar HH, Ngan P, Crout RJ, Mucino VH, Mukdadi OM.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):e59-71. PubMed ID: 21195258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Duration and anchorage management of canine retraction with bodily versus tipping mechanics.
    Shpack N, Davidovitch M, Sarne O, Panayi N, Vardimon AD.
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 18193953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Anchorage loss during canine retraction using intermittent versus continuous force distractions; a split mouth randomized clinical trial.
    Mowafy MI, Zaher AR.
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 23021114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Maxillary posterior intrusion mechanics with mini-implant anchorage evaluated with the finite element method.
    Çifter M, Saraç M.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):e233-41. PubMed ID: 22051501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Biomechanical effects of corticotomy approaches on dentoalveolar structures during canine retraction: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Yang C, Wang C, Deng F, Fan Y.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):457-65. PubMed ID: 26321344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Mandibular canine intrusion with the segmented arch technique: A finite element method study.
    Caballero GM, Carvalho Filho OA, Hargreaves BO, Brito HH, Magalhães Júnior PA, Oliveira DD.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 26038072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial.
    Sharma M, Sharma V, Khanna B.
    J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 39(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22773673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Three-dimensional finite element analysis to evaluate biomechanical effects of different alveolar decortication approaches on rate of canine retraction.
    Gupta S, Ahuja S, Bhambri E, Jaura BS, Ahuja V.
    Int Orthod; 2019 Jun; 17(2):216-226. PubMed ID: 31000446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Analysis of temporary skeletal anchorage devices used for en-masse retraction: a preliminary study.
    Kim SH, Hwang YS, Ferreira A, Chung KR.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 19651358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Skeletal anchorage systems in orthodontics: absolute anchorage. A dream or reality?
    Young KA, Melrose CA, Harrison JE.
    J Orthod; 2007 Jun; 34(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 17545297
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of initial displacement and stresses in the maxillary dentition following en masse retraction using fixed lingual appliance and micro-implants: A finite element analysis.
    Aghera D, Shyagali TR, Kambalya P.
    Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):451-460. PubMed ID: 31302004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.