These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
558 related items for PubMed ID: 24717701
21. Comparison of microleakage of different margin types around Class V resin restorations in primary teeth. Lopes Coutinho TC, Almeida Tostes M. Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Sep; 14(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 24295013 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of resin composite shade and location of the gingival margin on the microleakage of posterior restorations. Araujo Fde O, Vieira LC, Monteiro Junior S. Oper Dent; 2006 Sep; 31(5):556-61. PubMed ID: 17024943 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of microleakage of three acid-base luting cements versus one resin-bonded cement for Class V direct composite inlays. Piemjai M, Miyasaka K, Iwasaki Y, Nakabayashi N. J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):598-603. PubMed ID: 12488852 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Microleakage of glass ionomer/composite resin restorations: a laboratory study. 1. The influence of glass ionomer cement. Smith ED, Martin FE. Aust Dent J; 1992 Feb; 37(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 1533112 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of finishing/polishing techniques on microleakage of resin-modified glass ilonomer cement restorations. Yap AU, Yap WY, Yeo EJ, Tan JW, Ong DS. Oper Dent; 2003 Feb; 28(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 12540116 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Wilder AD, Swift EJ, May KN, Thompson JY, McDougal RA. J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies. Aggarwal V, Singla M, Yadav S, Yadav H. J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume. da Silva AF, Piva E, Demarco FF, Correr Sobrinho L, Osinga PW. Oper Dent; 2006 May; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations. Owens BM, Johnson WW. J Adhes Dent; 2005 May; 7(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 16430011 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of surface roughness of cavity preparations on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations. Shook LW, Turner EW, Ross J, Scarbecz M. Oper Dent; 2003 May; 28(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 14653294 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results. Neme AL, Evans DB, Maxson BB. Oper Dent; 2000 May; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Microleakage of Er:YAG laser and dental bur prepared cavities in primary teeth restored with different adhesive restorative materials. Baghalian A, Nakhjavani YB, Hooshmand T, Motahhary P, Bahramian H. Lasers Med Sci; 2013 Nov; 28(6):1453-60. PubMed ID: 23135785 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Gingival microleakage of class V composite restorations with fiber inserts. Ahmed W, El-Badrawy W, Kulkarni G, Prakki A, El-Mowafy O. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul 01; 14(4):622-8. PubMed ID: 24309339 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Protective effect of resin coating on the microleakage of Class V restorations following treatment with carbamide peroxide in vitro. Yu H, Li Q, Attin T, Wang Y. Oper Dent; 2010 Jul 01; 35(6):634-40. PubMed ID: 21180002 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]