These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
299 related items for PubMed ID: 24718058
1. Surgery for spinal stenosis: long-term reoperation rates, health care cost, and impact of instrumentation. Lad SP, Babu R, Ugiliweneza B, Patil CG, Boakye M. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May 20; 39(12):978-87. PubMed ID: 24718058 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: a nationwide cohort study. Kim CH, Chung CK, Park CS, Choi B, Hahn S, Kim MJ, Lee KS, Park BJ. Spine J; 2013 Oct 20; 13(10):1230-7. PubMed ID: 24017959 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented or noninstrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient selection, costs, and surgical outcomes. Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Lew RA, Grobler LJ, Weinstein JN, Brick GW, Fossel AH, Liang MH. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 May 15; 22(10):1123-31. PubMed ID: 9160471 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In Degenerative Spondylolisthesis, Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression Leads to Less Reoperations at 5 Years When Compared to Posterior Decompression With Instrumented Fusion: A Propensity-matched Retrospective Analysis. Kuo CC, Merchant M, Kardile MP, Yacob A, Majid K, Bains RS. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Nov 01; 44(21):1530-1537. PubMed ID: 31181016 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Decompression and Coflex interlaminar stabilization compared with decompression and instrumented spinal fusion for spinal stenosis and low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis: two-year results from the prospective, randomized, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial. Davis RJ, Errico TJ, Bae H, Auerbach JD. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug 15; 38(18):1529-39. PubMed ID: 23680830 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Interspinous device versus laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative effectiveness study. Patil CG, Sarmiento JM, Ugiliweneza B, Mukherjee D, Nuño M, Liu JC, Walia S, Lad SP, Boakye M. Spine J; 2014 Aug 01; 14(8):1484-92. PubMed ID: 24291409 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Lumbar Spinal Stenosis - decompression with vs. without instrumented fusion]. Daentzer D. Z Orthop Unfall; 2014 Aug 01; 152(4):310. PubMed ID: 25282742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Controversies about instrumented surgery and pain relief in degenerative lumbar spine pain. Results of scientific evidence]. Robaina-Padrón FJ. Neurocirugia (Astur); 2007 Oct 01; 18(5):406-13. PubMed ID: 18008014 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Rate of revision surgery after stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis. Nemani VM, Aichmair A, Taher F, Lebl DR, Hughes AP, Sama AA, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar 01; 39(5):E326-31. PubMed ID: 24299718 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios. Rampersaud YR, Tso P, Walker KR, Lewis SJ, Davey JR, Mahomed NN, Coyte PC. Spine J; 2014 Feb 01; 14(2):244-54. PubMed ID: 24239803 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]