These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

278 related items for PubMed ID: 24737141

  • 1. Retention of fissure sealants in young permanent molars affected by dental fluorosis: a 12-month clinical study.
    Hasanuddin S, Reddy ER, Manjula M, Srilaxmi N, Rani ST, Rajesh A.
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2014 Oct; 15(5):309-15. PubMed ID: 24737141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of acid versus laser etching on the clinical performance of a fissure sealant: 24-month results.
    Karaman E, Yazici AR, Baseren M, Gorucu J.
    Oper Dent; 2013 Oct; 38(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 23092148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of marginal integrity of glass ionomer and resin based fissure sealants using invasive and non-invasive techniques: an in vitro study.
    Gunjal S, Nagesh L, Raju HG.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012 Oct; 23(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 23059566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Twenty-four month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants on partially erupted permanent first molars: glass ionomer versus resin-based sealant.
    Antonson SA, Antonson DE, Brener S, Crutchfield J, Larumbe J, Michaud C, Yazici AR, Hardigan PC, Alempour S, Evans D, Ocanto R.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Feb; 143(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 22298552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Retention of a resin-based sealant and a glass ionomer used as a fissure sealant: a comparative clinical study.
    Subramaniam P, Konde S, Mandanna DK.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2008 Sep; 26(3):114-20. PubMed ID: 18923223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A two-year clinical evaluation of glass ionomer and ormocer based fissure sealants.
    Guler C, Yilmaz Y.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013 Sep; 37(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 23855170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Retention of fissure sealants using two different methods of application in teeth with hypomineralised molars (MIH): a 4 year clinical study.
    Lygidakis NA, Dimou G, Stamataki E.
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2009 Dec; 10(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 19995506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The success rates of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant placed by fifth-year undergraduate dental students.
    Ulusu T, Odabaş ME, Tüzüner T, Baygin O, Sillelioğlu H, Deveci C, Gökdoğan FG, Altuntaş A.
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2012 Apr; 13(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 22449810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study.
    Erdemir U, Sancakli HS, Yaman BC, Ozel S, Yucel T, Yıldız E.
    J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 24296163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of FUJI VII sealant material.
    Ganesh M, Tandon S.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006 Feb; 31(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 17091660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Survival Analysis of Glass Ionomer Cement and Resin-Based Sealant Retention: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study.
    Petrauskienė S, Saldūnaitė-Mikučionienė K, Narbutaitė J.
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 May 01; 60(5):. PubMed ID: 38792939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Retention and caries preventive effects of a GIC and a resin-based fissure sealant.
    Arrow P, Riordan PJ.
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1995 Oct 01; 23(5):282-5. PubMed ID: 8529341
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. One-year clinical evaluation of a Glass Carbomer fissure sealant, a preliminary study.
    Gorseta K, Glavina D, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Van Duinen RN, Skrinjaric I, Hill RG, Lynch E.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2014 Jun 01; 22(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 25134364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A 5-year evaluation of two glass-ionomer cements used as fissure sealants.
    Pardi V, Pereira AC, Mialhe FL, Meneghim Mde C, Ambrosano GM.
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2003 Oct 01; 31(5):386-91. PubMed ID: 14667010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Retention rates and caries-preventive effects of two different sealant materials: a randomised clinical trial.
    Cabral RN, Faber J, Otero SAM, Hilgert LA, Leal SC.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec 01; 22(9):3171-3177. PubMed ID: 29524027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Caries-Preventive Effect and Retention of Glass-Ionomer and Resin-Based Sealants: A Randomized Clinical Comparative Evaluation.
    Uzel I, Gurlek C, Kuter B, Ertugrul F, Eden E.
    Biomed Res Int; 2022 Dec 01; 2022():7205692. PubMed ID: 35769675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Clinical and antibacterial effectiveness of three different sealant materials.
    Amin HE.
    J Dent Hyg; 2008 Dec 01; 82(5):45. PubMed ID: 19055885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Retention of Moisture-tolerant and Conventional Resin-based Sealant in Six- to Nine-year-old Children.
    Khatri SG, Samuel SR, Acharya S, Patil S, Madan K.
    Pediatr Dent; 2015 Dec 01; 37(4):366-70. PubMed ID: 26314605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Glass ionomer ART sealant and fluoride-releasing resin sealant in fissure caries prevention--results from a randomized clinical trial.
    Liu BY, Xiao Y, Chu CH, Lo EC.
    BMC Oral Health; 2014 May 19; 14():54. PubMed ID: 24886444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.