These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

307 related items for PubMed ID: 24749629

  • 1. Evaluation of in vivo behavior of ameroid ring constrictors in dogs with congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts using computed tomography.
    Hunt GB, Culp WT, Mayhew KN, Mayhew P, Steffey MA, Zwingenberger A.
    Vet Surg; 2014 Oct; 43(7):834-42. PubMed ID: 24749629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Long-term clinical outcomes of dogs with single congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts attenuated with thin film banding or ameroid ring constrictors.
    Otomo A, Singh A, Jeong J, Dobberstein R, Lundhild A, Peter E, Brisson B, Oblak M, Milovancev M.
    Vet Surg; 2020 Apr; 49(3):436-444. PubMed ID: 31971276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Correlation between liver volume, portal vascular anatomy, and hepatic perfusion in dogs with congenital portosystemic shunt before and after placement of ameroid constrictors.
    Zwingenberger AL, Daniel L, Steffey MA, Mayhew PD, Mayhew KN, Culp WT, Hunt GB.
    Vet Surg; 2014 Nov; 43(8):926-34. PubMed ID: 24724740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Perioperative outcomes after three different single extrahepatic portosystemic shunt attenuation techniques in dogs: partial ligation, complete ligation and ameroid constrictor placement.
    Hurn SD, Edwards GA.
    Aust Vet J; 2003 Nov; 81(11):666-70. PubMed ID: 15086105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparative outcomes between ameroid ring constrictor and cellophane banding for treatment of single congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts in 49 dogs (1998-2012).
    Traverson M, Lussier B, Huneault L, Gatineau M.
    Vet Surg; 2018 Feb; 47(2):179-187. PubMed ID: 29247521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of ameroid ring constrictors for treatment for single extrahepatic portosystemic shunts in dogs: 168 cases (1995-2001).
    Mehl ML, Kyles AE, Hardie EM, Kass PH, Adin CA, Flynn AK, De Cock HE, Gregory CR.
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2005 Jun 15; 226(12):2020-30. PubMed ID: 15989185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Long-term outcome after surgical ameroid ring constrictor placement for treatment of single extrahepatic portosystemic shunts in dogs.
    Falls EL, Milovancev M, Hunt GB, Daniel L, Mehl ML, Schmiedt CW.
    Vet Surg; 2013 Nov 15; 42(8):951-7. PubMed ID: 24118005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of a portocaval venograft and ameroid ring for the occlusion of intrahepatic portocaval shunts in dogs.
    Kyles AE, Gregory CR, Jackson J, Ilkiw JE, Pascoe PJ, Adin C, Samii VF, Herrgesell E.
    Vet Surg; 2001 Nov 15; 30(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 11230770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A comparison of the Ameroid constrictor versus ligation in the surgical management of single extrahepatic portosystemic shunts.
    Murphy ST, Ellison GW, Long M, Van Gilder J.
    J Am Anim Hosp Assoc; 2001 Nov 15; 37(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 11450841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Surgical management of left-divisional intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: outcome after partial ligation of, or ameroid ring constrictor placement on, the left hepatic vein in twenty-eight dogs (1995-2005).
    Mehl ML, Kyles AE, Case JB, Kass PH, Zwingenberger A, Gregory CR.
    Vet Surg; 2007 Jan 15; 36(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 17214816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Treatment of congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts in dogs: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Serrano G, Charalambous M, Devriendt N, de Rooster H, Mortier F, Paepe D.
    J Vet Intern Med; 2019 Sep 15; 33(5):1865-1879. PubMed ID: 31471995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Re-evaluation of a portocaval venograft without an ameroid constrictor as a method for controlling portal hypertension after occlusion of intrahepatic portocaval shunts in dogs.
    Kyles AE, Gregory CR, Adin CA.
    Vet Surg; 2004 Sep 15; 33(6):691-8. PubMed ID: 15659026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Does hepatic steatosis have an impact on the short term hepatic response after complete attenuation of congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts? A prospective study of 20 dogs.
    Hunt GB, Luff J, Daniel L, Zwingenberger A.
    Vet Surg; 2014 Nov 15; 43(8):920-5. PubMed ID: 24819233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Use of transcolonic portal scintigraphy to evaluate efficacy of cellophane banding of congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts in 16 dogs.
    Landon BP, Abraham LA, Charles JA.
    Aust Vet J; 2008 May 15; 86(5):169-79; quiz CE1. PubMed ID: 18454834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Outcomes of dogs treated for extrahepatic congenital portosystemic shunts with thin film banding or ameroid ring constrictor.
    Matiasovic M, Chanoit GPA, Meakin LB, Tivers MS.
    Vet Surg; 2020 Jan 15; 49(1):160-171. PubMed ID: 31270829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Outcomes of intrahepatic portosystemic shunts occluded with ameroid constrictors in nine dogs and one cat.
    Bright SR, Williams JM, Niles JD.
    Vet Surg; 2006 Apr 15; 35(3):300-9. PubMed ID: 16635012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.