These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

681 related items for PubMed ID: 24754716

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Two-year clinical performance of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations.
    Baracco B, Perdigão J, Cabrera E, Ceballos L.
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):591-600. PubMed ID: 23570300
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches.
    Baracco B, Fuentes MV, Ceballos L.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jun; 20(5):991-1001. PubMed ID: 26388406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Repair of dimethacrylate-based composite restorations by a silorane-based composite: a one-year randomized clinical trial.
    Popoff DA, Santa Rosa TT, Ferreira RC, Magalhães CS, Moreira AN, Mjör IA.
    Oper Dent; 2012 Jun; 37(5):E1-10. PubMed ID: 22616930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage resin composite in endodontically treated premolars: 3-year follow-up.
    Gönülol N, Kalyoncuoğlu E, Ertaş E, Misilli T.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 May; 23(5):2323-2330. PubMed ID: 30293184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Methacrylate- and silorane-based composite restorations: hardness, depth of cure and interfacial gap formation as a function of the energy dose.
    D'Alpino PH, Bechtold J, dos Santos PJ, Alonso RC, Di Hipólito V, Silikas N, Rodrigues FP.
    Dent Mater; 2011 Nov; 27(11):1162-9. PubMed ID: 21925724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations.
    Kiremitci A, Alpaslan T, Gurgan S.
    Oper Dent; 2009 Nov; 34(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 19192832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Influence of surface treatment on the performance of silorane-based composite resin in class I restorations: a randomized clinical trial.
    Marques IP, de Oliveira FBS, Souza JGS, Ferreira RC, Magalhães CS, França FMG, Popoff DAV.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec; 22(9):2989-2996. PubMed ID: 29453496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Clinical Evaluation of a Silorane- and a Methacrylate-Based Resin Composite in Class II Restorations: 24-Month Results.
    Karaman E, Yazici AR, Ozgunaltay G, Ustunkol I, Berber A.
    Oper Dent; 2017 Dec; 42(4):E102-E110. PubMed ID: 28682704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The short-term clinical performance of a silorane-based resin composite in the proximal contacts of class II restorations.
    Goncalves FS, Castro CD, Bueno AC, Freitas AB, Moreira AN, Magalhaes CS.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 May 01; 13(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 22917991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive.
    Atalay C, Ozgunaltay G, Yazici AR.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Apr 01; 24(4):1569-1578. PubMed ID: 31468262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 35.