These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

284 related items for PubMed ID: 24758413

  • 1. Intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart rate during labor: an opportunity for shared decision making.
    Hersh S, Megregian M, Emeis C.
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(3):344-9. PubMed ID: 24758413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Auscultation of the fetal heart presents advantages over electronic monitoring.
    Sandmire HF, DeMott RK.
    Wis Med J; 1995 Dec; 94(12):661-3. PubMed ID: 8571614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Vintzileos AM, Antsaklis A, Varvarigos I, Papas C, Sofatzis I, Montgomery JT.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Intermittent Auscultation for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Surveillance: American College of Nurse-Midwives.
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2015 Jun; 60(5):626-32. PubMed ID: 26461195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Intermittent auscultation of fetal heart rate during labour - a widely accepted technique for low risk pregnancies: but are the current national guidelines robust and practical?
    Sholapurkar SL.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Jun; 30(6):537-40. PubMed ID: 20701496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Fetal health surveillance in labour.
    Liston R, Crane J, Hamilton E, Hughes O, Kuling S, MacKinnon C, McNamara H, Milne K, Richardson B, Trépanie MJ, Working Group on Fetal Health Surveillance in Labor, Executive and Council, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Committee, Clinical Practice Guidline Committee, and ALARM Committee, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Canada, Canadian Medical Protection Association.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2002 Mar; 24(3):250-76; quiz 277-80. PubMed ID: 12196876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Intermittent Auscultation for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Surveillance (replaces ACNM Clinical Bulletin #9, March 2007).
    American College of Nurse-MidwivesAmerican College of Nurse-Midwives, 8403 Colesville Rd, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA..
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2010 Mar; 55(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 20630370
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Fetal Heart Rate Auscultation, 3rd edition.
    Wisner K, Holschuh C.
    Nurs Womens Health; 2018 Dec; 22(6):e1-e32. PubMed ID: 30501909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Using fetal scalp stimulation with Doppler ultrasonography to enhance intermittent auscultation in low-resource settings: a diagnostic trial from Tanzania.
    Goodman DM, Mlay P, Thielman N, Small MJ, Schmitt JW.
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Feb 13; 19(1):71. PubMed ID: 30760224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Intermittent auscultation in low-risk labor.
    Wisner K.
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2015 Feb 13; 40(1):58. PubMed ID: 25503836
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Consumer information on fetal heart rate monitoring during labor: a content analysis: a content analysis.
    Torres J, De Vries R, Low LK.
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2014 Feb 13; 28(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 24781772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Clinical use of central electronic monitoring system].
    Guo X, Xu H, Xie K.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Jan 13; 35(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 11831942
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Sandmire HF.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Nov 13; 82(5):880-1. PubMed ID: 8414344
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Putting intelligent structured intermittent auscultation (ISIA) into practice.
    Maude RM, Skinner JP, Foureur MJ.
    Women Birth; 2016 Jun 13; 29(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 26710972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Electronic fetal monitoring: past, present, and future.
    Stout MJ, Cahill AG.
    Clin Perinatol; 2011 Mar 13; 38(1):127-42, vii. PubMed ID: 21353094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis.
    Vintzileos AM, Nochimson DJ, Guzman ER, Knuppel RA, Lake M, Schifrin BS.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan 13; 85(1):149-55. PubMed ID: 7800313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Intrapartum fetal distress].
    Guzmán E, Hasbún J, Espinoza R, Ramírez C, López J.
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1994 Jan 13; 59(5):325-42. PubMed ID: 7569147
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Fetal scalp stimulation test: an adjunct to intermittent auscultation in non-reassuring fetal status during labor.
    Rathore AM, Ramji S, Devi CB, Saini S, Manaktala U, Batra S.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Jul 13; 37(7):819-24. PubMed ID: 21410829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A randomized trial of electronic fetal monitoring in preterm labor.
    Luthy DA, Shy KK, van Belle G, Larson EB, Hughes JP, Benedetti TJ, Brown ZA, Effer S, King JF, Stenchever MA.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May 13; 69(5):687-95. PubMed ID: 3554055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis.
    Goodlin RC.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr 13; 85(4):643; author reply 643-4. PubMed ID: 7898852
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.