These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
183 related items for PubMed ID: 24759123
1. Measurement of pulse wave velocity in children: comparison of volumetric and tonometric sensors, brachial-femoral and carotid-femoral pathways. Keehn L, Milne L, McNeill K, Chowienczyk P, Sinha MD. J Hypertens; 2014 Jul; 32(7):1464-9; discussion 1469. PubMed ID: 24759123 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Vicorder device compared with SphygmoCor in the assessment of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Shahin Y, Barakat H, Barnes R, Chetter I. Hypertens Res; 2013 Mar; 36(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 23034469 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproducibility of arterial stiffness and wave reflections in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the contribution of lung hyperinflation and a comparison of techniques. Stone IS, John L, Petersen SE, Barnes NC. Respir Med; 2013 Nov; 107(11):1700-8. PubMed ID: 23920329 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Parameters of pulse wave velocity: determinants and reference values assessed in the population-based study LIFE-Adult. Baier D, Teren A, Wirkner K, Loeffler M, Scholz M. Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Nov; 107(11):1050-1061. PubMed ID: 29766282 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity assessment using novel cuff-based techniques: comparison with tonometric measurement. Butlin M, Qasem A, Battista F, Bozec E, McEniery CM, Millet-Amaury E, Pucci G, Wilkinson IB, Schillaci G, Boutouyrie P, Avolio AP. J Hypertens; 2013 Nov; 31(11):2237-43; discussion 2243. PubMed ID: 24077246 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity and repeatability of the Vicorder apparatus: a comparison with the SphygmoCor device. Hickson SS, Butlin M, Broad J, Avolio AP, Wilkinson IB, McEniery CM. Hypertens Res; 2009 Dec; 32(12):1079-85. PubMed ID: 19779487 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Automatic or manual arterial path for the ankle-brachial differences pulse wave velocity. Sánchez Muñoz-Torrero JF, Calderón-García JF, De Nicolás-Jiménez JM, García-Ortiz L, Rodilla-Salas E, Gómez-Marcos MA, Suárez-Fernandez C, Cordovilla-Guardia S, Rico-Martín S. PLoS One; 2018 Dec; 13(11):e0206434. PubMed ID: 30383780 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Determinants of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in healthy Koreans. Jang SY, Ju EY, Huh EH, Kim JH, Kim DK. J Korean Med Sci; 2014 Jun; 29(6):798-804. PubMed ID: 24932081 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility of oscillometric aortic pressure and stiffness assessment using the VaSera VS-1500: comparison with a common tonometric method. Endes S, Bachler M, Li Y, Mayer C, Hanssen H, Hametner B, Schmidt-Trucksäss A, Wassertheurer S. Blood Press Monit; 2015 Oct; 20(5):273-9. PubMed ID: 26065840 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Utility of automated brachial ankle pulse wave velocity measurements in hypertensive patients. Munakata M, Ito N, Nunokawa T, Yoshinaga K. Am J Hypertens; 2003 Aug; 16(8):653-7. PubMed ID: 12878371 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Current assessment of pulse wave velocity: comprehensive review of validation studies. Milan A, Zocaro G, Leone D, Tosello F, Buraioli I, Schiavone D, Veglio F. J Hypertens; 2019 Aug; 37(8):1547-1557. PubMed ID: 30882597 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]