These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Valuable Tool for Predicting Parametrial Invasion in Stage IB1 to IIA2 Cervical Cancer. Kim M, Suh DH, Kim K, Lee HJ, Kim YB, No JH. Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Feb; 27(2):332-338. PubMed ID: 28114236 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of Parametrial Involvement in Early Stages Cervical Cancer With Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging. He F, Du J, Chen X, He L. Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Nov; 28(9):1758-1765. PubMed ID: 30153214 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors associated with parametrial involvement in stage IB1 cervical cancer and identification of patients suitable for less radical surgery. Kodama J, Kusumoto T, Nakamura K, Seki N, Hongo A, Hiramatsu Y. Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Sep; 122(3):491-4. PubMed ID: 21703671 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging criteria for predicting lymph node metastasis in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer. He F, Zu S, Chen X, Liu J, Yi Y, Yang H, Wang F, Yuan S. Cancer Med; 2021 Aug; 10(16):5429-5436. PubMed ID: 34278729 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Radical hysterectomy compared with primary radiation for treatment of stage IB1 cervix cancer. Doll KM, Donnelly E, Helenowski I, Rosenbloom L, Small W, Schink JC, Lurain JR. Am J Clin Oncol; 2014 Feb; 37(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 22992622 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Apparent diffusion coefficient for prediction of parametrial invasion in cervical cancer: a critical evaluation based on stratification to a Likert scale using T2-weighted imaging. Woo S, Kim SY, Cho JY, Kim SH. Radiol Med; 2018 Mar; 123(3):209-216. PubMed ID: 29058233 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]