These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

295 related items for PubMed ID: 24791049

  • 1. A comparison of Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III scoring system in predicting mortality and length of stay at surgical intensive care unit.
    Gilani MT, Razavi M, Azad AM.
    Niger Med J; 2014 Mar; 55(2):144-7. PubMed ID: 24791049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation and Validation of Four Scoring Systems: the APACHE IV, SAPS III, MPM0 II, and ICMM in Critically Ill Cancer Patients.
    Siddiqui SS, Narkhede AM, Kulkarni AP, Prabu NR, Chaudhari HK, Sarode SV, Divatia JV.
    Indian J Crit Care Med; 2020 Apr; 24(4):263-269. PubMed ID: 32565637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Intensive care unit scoring systems outperform emergency department scoring systems for mortality prediction in critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study.
    Moseson EM, Zhuo H, Chu J, Stein JC, Matthay MA, Kangelaris KN, Liu KD, Calfee CS.
    J Intensive Care; 2014 Apr; 2():40. PubMed ID: 25960880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Comparing the performance of three severity scoring systems for ICU patients: APACHE III, SAPS II, MPM II].
    Kim EK, Kwon YD, Hwang JH.
    J Prev Med Public Health; 2005 Aug; 38(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 16323627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparison of severity of illness scoring systems for intensive care unit patients: results of a multicenter, multinational study. The European/North American Severity Study Group.
    Castella X, Artigas A, Bion J, Kari A.
    Crit Care Med; 1995 Aug; 23(8):1327-35. PubMed ID: 7634802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effectiveness of the sequential organ failure assessment, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II, and simplified acute physiology score II prognostic scoring systems in paraquat-poisoned patients in the intensive care unit.
    Lee JH, Hwang SY, Kim HR, Kim YW, Kang MJ, Cho KW, Lee DW, Kim YH.
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2017 May; 36(5):431-437. PubMed ID: 27387349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Performance of three prognostic models in patients with cancer in need of intensive care in a medical center in China.
    Xing X, Gao Y, Wang H, Huang C, Qu S, Zhang H, Wang H, Sun K.
    PLoS One; 2015 May; 10(6):e0131329. PubMed ID: 26110534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of the performance of SAPS II, SAPS 3, APACHE II, and their customized prognostic models in a surgical intensive care unit.
    Sakr Y, Krauss C, Amaral AC, Réa-Neto A, Specht M, Reinhart K, Marx G.
    Br J Anaesth; 2008 Dec; 101(6):798-803. PubMed ID: 18845649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Performance of the third-generation models of severity scoring systems (APACHE IV, SAPS 3 and MPM-III) in acute kidney injury critically ill patients.
    Costa e Silva VT, de Castro I, Liaño F, Muriel A, Rodríguez-Palomares JR, Yu L.
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2011 Dec; 26(12):3894-901. PubMed ID: 21505093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Assessment of the performance of five intensive care scoring models within a large Scottish database.
    Livingston BM, MacKirdy FN, Howie JC, Jones R, Norrie JD.
    Crit Care Med; 2000 Jun; 28(6):1820-7. PubMed ID: 10890627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The Simplified Acute Physiology Score III Is Superior to the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II in Predicting Surgical and ICU Mortality in the "Oldest Old".
    Haq A, Patil S, Parcells AL, Chamberlain RS.
    Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res; 2014 Jun; 2014():934852. PubMed ID: 24696680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Prognostic scores in a gastroenterology intensive care unit.
    Freire P, Romãozinho JM, Amaro P, Ferreira M, Sofia C.
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2010 Oct; 102(10):596-601. PubMed ID: 21039069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A comparison of APACHE II and SAPS II scoring systems in predicting hospital mortality in Thai adult intensive care units.
    Khwannimit B, Geater A.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Apr; 90(4):643-52. PubMed ID: 17487117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Predictive value of six critical illness scores for 28-day death risk in comprehensive and specialized intensive care unit patients based on MIMIC-IV database].
    Zhu S, Chen H, Li X, Gulifeire T, Wang Y, Yang C, Yu X.
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2022 Jul; 34(7):752-758. PubMed ID: 36100416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.