These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

504 related items for PubMed ID: 24797760

  • 1. Adverse effects of first-degree AV-block in patients with sinus node dysfunction: data from the mode selection trial.
    Holmqvist F, Hellkamp AS, Lee KL, Lamas GA, Daubert JP, MOST investigators.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 Sep; 37(9):1111-9. PubMed ID: 24797760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Minimizing ventricular pacing by a novel atrioventricular (AV) delay hysteresis algorithm in patients with intact or compromised intrinsic AV conduction and different atrial and ventricular lead locations.
    Pakarinen S, Toivonen L.
    Ann Med; 2013 Sep; 45(5-6):438-45. PubMed ID: 23768003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction.
    Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA, Greenspon AJ, Freedman RA, Lee KL, Lamas GA, MOde Selection Trial Investigators.
    Circulation; 2003 Jun 17; 107(23):2932-7. PubMed ID: 12782566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The PhysioVP-AF study, a randomized controlled trial to assess the clinical benefit of physiological ventricular pacing vs. managed ventricular pacing for persistent atrial fibrillation prevention in patients with prolonged atrioventricular conduction: design and rationale.
    Pastore G, Bertini M, Bonanno C, Coluccia G, Dell'Era G, De Mattia L, Grieco D, Katsouras G, Maines M, Marcantoni L, Marinaccio L, Paglino G, Palmisano P, Ziacchi M, Zoppo F, Noventa F.
    Europace; 2023 May 19; 25(5):. PubMed ID: 36974970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Reduction of unnecessary right ventricular pacing by managed ventricular pacing and search AV+ algorithms in pacemaker patients: 12-month follow-up results of a randomized study.
    Chen S, Chen K, Tao Q, Zheng L, Shen F, Wu S, Fan J, Xu G, Wang L, Zhou X, Zhang S, COMPARE Study Investigators.
    Europace; 2014 Nov 19; 16(11):1595-602. PubMed ID: 24706091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Safety and efficiency of ventricular pacing prevention with an AAI-DDD changeover mode in patients with sinus node disease or atrioventricular block: impact on battery longevity-a sub-study of the ANSWER trial.
    Stockburger M, Defaye P, Boveda S, Stancak B, Lazarus A, Sipötz J, Nardi S, Rolando M, Moreno J.
    Europace; 2016 May 19; 18(5):739-46. PubMed ID: 26612882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Atrial pacing site and atrioventricular conduction in patients paced for sinus node disease.
    Watabe T, Abe H, Kohno R, Oginosawa Y, Hayashi K, Ohe H, Tamura M, Takeuchi M, Otsuji Y.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Nov 19; 25(11):1224-31. PubMed ID: 24946835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Reducing unnecessary right ventricular pacing with the managed ventricular pacing mode in patients with sinus node disease and AV block.
    Gillis AM, Pürerfellner H, Israel CW, Sunthorn H, Kacet S, Anelli-Monti M, Tang F, Young M, Boriani G, Medtronic Enrhythm Clinical Study Investigators.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Jul 19; 29(7):697-705. PubMed ID: 16884504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Long-term reliability of AAI mode pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction and low Wenckebach block rate.
    Adachi M, Igawa O, Yano A, Miake J, Inoue Y, Ogura K, Kato M, Iitsuka K, Hisatome I.
    Europace; 2008 Feb 19; 10(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 18199569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. AAIsafeR limits ventricular pacing in unselected patients.
    Pioger G, Leny G, Nitzsché R, Ripart A.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jan 19; 30 Suppl 1():S66-70. PubMed ID: 17302721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Near elimination of ventricular pacing in SafeR mode compared to DDD modes: a randomized study of 422 patients.
    Davy JM, Hoffmann E, Frey A, Jocham K, Rossi S, Dupuis JM, Frabetti L, Ducloux P, Prades E, Jauvert G.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Apr 19; 35(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 22309303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of PR interval and pacing mode on persistent atrial fibrillation incidence in dual chamber pacemaker patients: a sub-study of the international randomized MINERVA trial.
    Boriani G, Pieragnoli P, Botto GL, Puererfellner H, Mont L, Ziacchi M, Manolis AS, Gulizia M, Tukkie R, Landolina M, Ricciardi G, Cicconelli M, Grammatico A, Biffi M.
    Europace; 2019 Apr 01; 21(4):636-644. PubMed ID: 30649270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Occurrence of significant long PR intervals in patients implanted for sinus node dysfunction and monitored with SafeR™: The PRECISE study.
    Taieb J, Le Franc P, Khattar P, Moubarak G, Gorka H, Godenir JP, Deutsch P, Degand B, Al Daoud A, Elkaim JP, Elbaz N, Merlo S, Lellouche N.
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2019 Mar 01; 112(3):153-161. PubMed ID: 30594571
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Pacemaker-based analysis of atrioventricular conduction and atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with primary sinus node dysfunction.
    Stockburger M, Trautmann F, Nitardy A, Just-Teetzmann M, Schade S, Celebi O, Krebs A, Dietz R.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 May 01; 32(5):604-13. PubMed ID: 19422581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: implications for selection of stimulation mode.
    Brandt J, Anderson H, Fåhraeus T, Schüller H.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Sep 01; 20(3):633-9. PubMed ID: 1512343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Electrophysiological determinants of atrial fibrillation in sinus node dysfunction despite atrial pacing.
    De Sisti A, Attuel P, Manot S, Fiorello P, Halimi F, Leclercq JF.
    Europace; 2000 Oct 01; 2(4):304-11. PubMed ID: 11194597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of atrial and VVI pacing modes in symptomatic sinus node dysfunction without associated tachyarrhythmias.
    Sethi KK, Bajaj V, Mohan JC, Arora R, Khalilullah M.
    Indian Heart J; 1990 Oct 01; 42(3):143-7. PubMed ID: 2258196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Minimizing right ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node disease and prolonged PQ interval: The impact on exercise capacity.
    Krzyżanowski K, Michałkiewicz D, Orski Z, Wierzbowski R, Ryczek R, Cwetsch A.
    Cardiol J; 2015 Oct 01; 22(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 24846513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Predictors of stroke in patients paced for sick sinus syndrome.
    Greenspon AJ, Hart RG, Dawson D, Hellkamp AS, Silver M, Flaker GC, Schron E, Goldman L, Lee KL, Lamas GA, MOST Study Investigators.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 May 05; 43(9):1617-22. PubMed ID: 15120821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A 2:1 AV rhythm: an adverse effect of a long AV delay during DDI pacing and its prevention by the ventricular intrinsic preference algorithm in DDD mode.
    Minamiguchi H, Oginosawa Y, Kohno R, Tamura M, Takeuchi M, Otsuji Y, Abe H.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Jul 05; 35(7):e189-92. PubMed ID: 21671954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.