These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
202 related items for PubMed ID: 24799118
1. Methods and preliminary findings of a cost-effectiveness study of glass-ionomer-based and composite resin sealant materials after 2 yr. Goldman AS, Chen X, Fan M, Frencken JE. Eur J Oral Sci; 2014 Jun; 122(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 24799118 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness, in a randomized trial, of glass-ionomer-based and resin sealant materials after 4 yr. Goldman AS, Chen X, Fan M, Frencken JE. Eur J Oral Sci; 2016 Oct; 124(5):472-479. PubMed ID: 27666137 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Caries-preventive effect of sealants produced with altered glass-ionomer materials, after 2 years. Chen X, Du MQ, Fan MW, Mulder J, Huysmans MC, Frencken JE. Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):554-60. PubMed ID: 22300651 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. One-year clinical evaluation of a Glass Carbomer fissure sealant, a preliminary study. Gorseta K, Glavina D, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Van Duinen RN, Skrinjaric I, Hill RG, Lynch E. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2014 Jun; 22(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 25134364 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Caries-preventive effect of a one-time application of composite resin and glass ionomer sealants after 5 years. Beiruti N, Frencken JE, van't Hof MA, Taifour D, van Palenstein Helderman WH. Caries Res; 2006 Jun; 40(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 16352882 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Do light cured ART conventional high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants perform better than resin-composite sealants: a 4-year randomized clinical trial. Zhang W, Chen X, Fan MW, Mulder J, Huysmans MC, Frencken JE. Dent Mater; 2014 May; 30(5):487-92. PubMed ID: 24602520 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal leakage of two newer glass-ionomer-based sealant materials assessed using micro-CT. Chen X, Cuijpers V, Fan M, Frencken JE. J Dent; 2010 Sep; 38(9):731-5. PubMed ID: 20580767 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Glass ionomer ART sealants in Chinese school children-6-year results. Holmgren CJ, Lo EC, Hu D. J Dent; 2013 Sep; 41(9):764-70. PubMed ID: 23831419 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Retention Rate of Four Different Sealant Materials after Four Years. Zhang W, Chen X, Fan M, Mulder J, Frencken JE. Oral Health Prev Dent; 2017 Sep; 15(4):307-314. PubMed ID: 28752157 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Treating High-Caries Risk Occlusal Surfaces in First Permanent Molars through Sealants and Supervised Toothbrushing: A 3-Year Cost-Effective Analysis. Goldman A, Leal SC, de Amorim RG, Frencken JE. Caries Res; 2017 Sep; 51(5):489-499. PubMed ID: 28954261 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Caries prevention effectiveness of aresin based sealant and a glass ionomer sealants: a report of 5-year-follow-up]. Liu YJ, Chang Q, Rong WS, Zhao XL. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jul 09; 53(7):437-442. PubMed ID: 29996359 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Pit and fissure sealant: review of the literature. Simonsen RJ. Pediatr Dent; 2002 Jul 09; 24(5):393-414. PubMed ID: 12412954 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of caries prevention with glass ionomer and composite resin fissure sealants. Oba AA, Dülgergil T, Sönmez IS, Doğan S. J Formos Med Assoc; 2009 Nov 09; 108(11):844-8. PubMed ID: 19933027 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Handling and clinical performance of a glass ionomer sealant. Smales RJ, Lee YK, Lo FW, Tse CC, Chung MS. Am J Dent; 1996 Oct 09; 9(5):203-5. PubMed ID: 9545905 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Can Glass ionomer sealants be cost-effective? Kervanto-Seppälä S, Lavonius E, Kerosuo E, Pietilä I. J Clin Dent; 2000 Oct 09; 11(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 11460286 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant. Beresescu L, Kovacs M, Vlasa A, Stoica AM, Benedek C, Pop M, Bungardean D, Eșian D. Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb 10; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 35206153 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of glass-ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: a 2-year clinical trial. Forss H, Saarni UM, Seppä L. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1994 Feb 10; 22(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 8143437 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of two new types of sealants: retention after 2 years. Chen X, Du M, Fan M, Mulder J, Huysmans MC, Frencken JE. Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Oct 10; 16(5):1443-50. PubMed ID: 22124610 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Caries-Preventive Effect of High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer and Resin-Based Fissure Sealants on Permanent Teeth: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials. Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V. PLoS One; 2016 Oct 10; 11(1):e0146512. PubMed ID: 26799812 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: a clinical study. Mejàre I, Mjör IA. Scand J Dent Res; 1990 Aug 10; 98(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 2144660 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]