These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

254 related items for PubMed ID: 24802187

  • 1. Finding the most accurate method to measure head circumference for fetal weight estimation.
    Schmidt U, Temerinac D, Bildstein K, Tuschy B, Mayer J, Sütterlin M, Siemer J, Kehl S.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jul; 178():153-6. PubMed ID: 24802187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of different sonographic methods to determine fetal abdominal circumference.
    Kehl S, Zaiss I, Freiburg F, Speierer A, Sütterlin M, Siemer J.
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2010 Jul; 28(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 20881366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. New sonographic method for fetuses with small abdominal circumference improves fetal weight estimation.
    Kehl S, Körber C, Hart N, Goecke TW, Schild RL, Siemer J.
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Oct; 33(5):469-73. PubMed ID: 21630187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. New sonographic method for fetuses with a large abdominal circumference improves fetal weight estimation.
    Kehl S, Körber C, Hart N, Goecke TW, Schild RL, Siemer J.
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 21080309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Accuracy of ultrasonic fetal weight estimation using head and abdominal circumference and femur length].
    Mladenović-Segedi L, Segedi D.
    Med Pregl; 2005 Jun; 58(11-12):548-52. PubMed ID: 16673856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. How good is fetal weight estimation using volumetric methods?
    Siemer J, Peter W, Zollver H, Hart N, Müller A, Meurer B, Goecke T, Schild RL.
    Ultraschall Med; 2008 Aug; 29(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 18484061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. What are the limits of accuracy in fetal weight estimation with conventional biometry in two-dimensional ultrasound? A novel postpartum study.
    Kehl S, Schmidt U, Spaich S, Schild RL, Sütterlin M, Siemer J.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 39(5):543-8. PubMed ID: 21898638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Ultrasound-based gestational-age estimation in late pregnancy.
    Papageorghiou AT, Kemp B, Stones W, Ohuma EO, Kennedy SH, Purwar M, Salomon LJ, Altman DG, Noble JA, Bertino E, Gravett MG, Pang R, Cheikh Ismail L, Barros FC, Lambert A, Jaffer YA, Victora CG, Bhutta ZA, Villar J, International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century (INTERGROWTH-21st).
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 48(6):719-726. PubMed ID: 26924421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Scientific basis for standardization of fetal head measurements by ultrasound: a reproducibility study.
    Napolitano R, Donadono V, Ohuma EO, Knight CL, Wanyonyi SZ, Kemp B, Norris T, Papageorghiou AT.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jul; 48(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 27158767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models.
    Hammami A, Mazer Zumaeta A, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 29611251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Do specific weight formulas for fetuses < or = 1500 g really improve weight estimation?
    Hoopmann M, Bernau B, Hart N, Schild RL, Siemer J.
    Ultraschall Med; 2010 Feb; 31(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 20091464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A new sonographic weight formula for fetuses <or= 2500 g.
    Siemer J, Hilbert A, Hart N, Meurer B, Goecke T, Schild RL.
    Ultraschall Med; 2009 Feb; 30(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 19137495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.
    Proctor LK, Rushworth V, Shah PS, Keunen J, Windrim R, Ryan G, Kingdom J.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 20196066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Discrepancy of ultrasound biometric parameters of the head (HC--head circumference, BPD--biparietal diameter) and femur length in relation to sex of the fetus and duration of pregnancy].
    L'ubuský M, Mícková I, Procházka M, Dzvincuk P, Malá K, Cízek L, Janout V.
    Ceska Gynekol; 2006 May; 71(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 16768041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Intrapartum sonographic weight estimation.
    Faschingbauer F, Dammer U, Raabe E, Schneider M, Faschingbauer C, Schmid M, Schild RL, Beckmann MW, Kehl S, Mayr A.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Oct; 292(4):805-11. PubMed ID: 25870017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of three sonographic circumference measurement techniques to predict birth weight.
    Smulian JC, Ranzini AC, Ananth CV, Rosenberg JC, Vintzileos AM.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 93(5 Pt 1):692-6. PubMed ID: 10912969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Fetal biometry between 20-42 weeks of gestation for Polish population.
    Dubiel M, Krajewski M, Pietryga M, Tretyn A, Breborowicz G, Lindquist P, Gudmundsson S.
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):746-53. PubMed ID: 19140496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Sonographic estimation of fetal head circumference: how accurate are we?
    Melamed N, Yogev Y, Danon D, Mashiach R, Meizner I, Ben-Haroush A.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 20661958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Discrepancy in ultrasound biometric parameters of the head (HC--head circumference, BPD--biparietal diameter) in breech presented fetuses.
    Lubusky M, Prochazka M, Langova M, Vomackova K, Cizek L.
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2007 Dec; 151(2):323-6. PubMed ID: 18345272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Automated fetal head detection and measurement in ultrasound images by iterative randomized Hough transform.
    Lu W, Tan J, Floyd R.
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 31(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 15972198
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.