These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1040 related items for PubMed ID: 24809318

  • 1. Model-based iterative reconstruction compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back-projection in CT of the kidneys and the adjacent retroperitoneum.
    Olcott EW, Shin LK, Sommer G, Chan I, Rosenberg J, Molvin FL, Boas FE, Fleischmann D.
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):774-84. PubMed ID: 24809318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
    Chang W, Lee JM, Lee K, Yoon JH, Yu MH, Han JK, Choi BI.
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
    Singh S, Kalra MK, Do S, Thibault JB, Pien H, O'Connor OJ, Blake MA.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012 Aug; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study.
    Deák Z, Grimm JM, Treitl M, Geyer LL, Linsenmaier U, Körner M, Reiser MF, Wirth S.
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 23169793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality.
    Shuman WP, Chan KT, Busey JM, Mitsumori LM, Choi E, Koprowicz KM, Kanal KM.
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 25170546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients.
    Vardhanabhuti V, Riordan RD, Mitchell GR, Hyde C, Roobottom CA.
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 24368613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. CT of the pancreas: comparison of image quality and pancreatic duct depiction among model-based iterative, adaptive statistical iterative, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Lin XZ, Machida H, Tanaka I, Fukui R, Ueno E, Chen KM, Yan FH.
    Abdom Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 24496703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Submillisievert chest CT with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction techniques.
    Padole A, Singh S, Ackman JB, Wu C, Do S, Pourjabbar S, Khawaja RD, Otrakji A, Digumarthy S, Shepard JA, Kalra M.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):772-81. PubMed ID: 25247943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Image quality assessment of standard- and low-dose chest CT using filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and novel model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms.
    Vardhanabhuti V, Loader RJ, Mitchell GR, Riordan RD, Roobottom CA.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):545-52. PubMed ID: 23436843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. CT Dose Reduction for Visceral Adipose Tissue Measurement: Effects of Model-Based and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstructions and Filtered Back Projection.
    Yamada Y, Jinzaki M, Niijima Y, Hashimoto M, Yamada M, Abe T, Kuribayashi S.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):W677-83. PubMed ID: 26001256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of the image qualities of filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction for CT venography at 80 kVp.
    Kim JH, Choo KS, Moon TY, Lee JW, Jeon UB, Kim TU, Hwang JY, Yun MJ, Jeong DW, Lim SJ.
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):2055-63. PubMed ID: 26486938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Iterative reconstruction: comparison of techniques for reduced-dose liver computed tomography following transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Cha MJ, Jeong WK, Choi D, Kim YK, Lim S, Choi SY, Lee WJ.
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Dec; 57(12):1429-1437. PubMed ID: 26792822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effects of pure and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithms on high-resolution computed tomography in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease.
    Katsura M, Sato J, Akahane M, Mise Y, Sumida K, Abe O.
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():243-251. PubMed ID: 28668422
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Assessment of Filtered Back Projection, Adaptive Statistical, and Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction for Reduced Dose Abdominal Computed Tomography.
    Padole A, Singh S, Lira D, Blake MA, Pourjabbar S, Khawaja RD, Choy G, Saini S, Do S, Kalra MK.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015 Aug; 39(4):462-7. PubMed ID: 25734468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Image quality of CT angiography with model-based iterative reconstruction in young children with congenital heart disease: comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Son SS, Choo KS, Jeon UB, Jeon GR, Nam KJ, Kim TU, Yeom JA, Hwang JY, Jeong DW, Lim SJ.
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun; 31 Suppl 1():31-8. PubMed ID: 25414055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Application of a full model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in 80 kVp ultra-low-dose paranasal sinus CT imaging of pediatric patients.
    Sun J, Zhang Q, Duan X, Zhang C, Wang P, Jia C, Liu Y, Peng Y.
    Radiol Med; 2018 Feb; 123(2):117-124. PubMed ID: 29019028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 52.