These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


120 related items for PubMed ID: 24811038

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Reduced OSM for long duration targets: individuation or items loaded into VSTM?
    Guest D, Gellatly A, Pilling M.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Dec; 38(6):1541-53. PubMed ID: 22288695
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Gestalt grouping and common onset masking.
    Kahan TA, Mathis KM.
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Nov; 64(8):1248-59. PubMed ID: 12519023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Backward masking interrupts spatial attention, slows downstream processing, and limits conscious perception.
    Losier T, Lefebvre C, Doro M, Dell'Acqua R, Jolicœur P.
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Sep; 54():101-113. PubMed ID: 28410866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Delayed offset of distracters masks a local target.
    Luiga I, Gellatly A, Bachmann T.
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):344-52. PubMed ID: 20413101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Object individuation is invariant to attentional diffusion: Changes in the size of the attended region do not interact with object-substitution masking.
    Goodhew SC, Edwards M.
    Cognition; 2016 Dec; 157():358-364. PubMed ID: 27764691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Reward-associated features capture attention in the absence of awareness: Evidence from object-substitution masking.
    Harris JA, Donohue SE, Schoenfeld MA, Hopf JM, Heinze HJ, Woldorff MG.
    Neuroimage; 2016 Aug 15; 137():116-123. PubMed ID: 27153978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. How does target duration affect object substitution masking?
    Gellatly A, Pilling M, Carter W, Guest D.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct 15; 36(5):1267-79. PubMed ID: 20873938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Object-substitution masking weakens but does not eliminate shape interactions.
    Sweeny TD, D'Abreu LC, Elias E, Padama L.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct 15; 79(7):2179-2189. PubMed ID: 28718174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. A novel paradigm reveals the role of reentrant visual processes in object substitution masking.
    Jannati A, Spalek TM, Di Lollo V.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug 15; 75(6):1118-27. PubMed ID: 23673610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect.
    Xu B, Tanaka JW.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan 15; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Asymmetric object substitution masking.
    Jiang Y, Chun MM.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Aug 15; 27(4):895-918. PubMed ID: 11518152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Object substitution and its relation to other forms of visual masking.
    Enns JT.
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun 15; 44(12):1321-31. PubMed ID: 15066393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.