These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

143 related items for PubMed ID: 24815280

  • 1. Evaluation of the importance of time-frequency contributions to speech intelligibility in noise.
    Yu C, Wójcicki KK, Loizou PC, Hansen JH, Johnson MT.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 May; 135(5):3007-16. PubMed ID: 24815280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. An algorithm that improves speech intelligibility in noise for normal-hearing listeners.
    Kim G, Lu Y, Hu Y, Loizou PC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1486-94. PubMed ID: 19739761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Improvement of intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech by adding background noise.
    Cao S, Li L, Wu X.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2227-36. PubMed ID: 21476677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. An ideal quantized mask to increase intelligibility and quality of speech in noise.
    Healy EW, Vasko JL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Sep; 144(3):1392. PubMed ID: 30424638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: implications for noise reduction.
    Li N, Loizou PC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1673-82. PubMed ID: 18345855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Role of mask pattern in intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech.
    Kjems U, Boldt JB, Pedersen MS, Lunner T, Wang D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1415-26. PubMed ID: 19739755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Channel selection in the modulation domain for improved speech intelligibility in noise.
    Wójcicki KK, Loizou PC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2904-13. PubMed ID: 22501068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
    Brons I, Houben R, Dreschler WA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Speech intelligibility in reverberation with ideal binary masking: effects of early reflections and signal-to-noise ratio threshold.
    Roman N, Woodruff J.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1707-17. PubMed ID: 23464040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Intelligibility of reverberant noisy speech with ideal binary masking.
    Roman N, Woodruff J.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2153-61. PubMed ID: 21973369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility: dependency on signal-to-noise ratios.
    Hilkhuysen G, Gaubitch N, Brookes M, Huckvale M.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):531-9. PubMed ID: 22280614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Structure in time-frequency binary masking errors and its impact on speech intelligibility.
    Kressner AA, Rozell CJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Apr; 137(4):2025-35. PubMed ID: 25920853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T, Zekveld AA, Festen JM, Kramer SE.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Apr; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of ideal mask-based speech enhancement algorithms for speech mixed with white noise at low mixture signal-to-noise ratios.
    Graetzer S, Hopkins C.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Dec; 152(6):3458. PubMed ID: 36586840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Recognition of speech in noise after application of time-frequency masks: dependence on frequency and threshold parameters.
    Sinex DG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2390-6. PubMed ID: 23556604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J, Hu H, Zheng C, Li G, Lutman ME, Bleeck S.
    Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
    Chen F, Loizou PC.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Predicting the intelligibility of vocoded speech.
    Chen F, Loizou PC.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Apr; 32(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 21206363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility.
    Johnson EE, Dillon H.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Apr; 22(7):441-59. PubMed ID: 21993050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.