These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

196 related items for PubMed ID: 24828218

  • 1. A treatise on the thresholds of interoctave frequencies: 1500, 3000, and 6000 Hz.
    Wilson RH, McArdle R.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):171-86. PubMed ID: 24828218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A Large-Scale Examination of Veterans with Normal Pure-Tone Hearing Thresholds within the Department of Veterans Affairs.
    Billings CJ, Dillard LK, Hoskins ZB, Penman TM, Reavis KM.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Feb; 29(10):928-935. PubMed ID: 30479265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
    Wilson RH.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Feb; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Otitis media with effusion in children: Cross-frequency correlation in pure tone audiometry.
    Chow AHC, Cai T, McPherson B, Yang F.
    PLoS One; 2019 Feb; 14(8):e0221405. PubMed ID: 31437206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Some observations on the nature of the audiometric 4000 hz notch: data from 3430 veterans.
    Wilson RH.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Jan; 22(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 21419067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Reliability of the Home Hearing Test: Implications for Public Health.
    Mosley CL, Langley LM, Davis A, McMahon CM, Tremblay KL.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):208-216. PubMed ID: 30461396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
    Vermiglio AJ, Soli SD, Freed DJ, Fisher LM.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Mar; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Reliability in Hearing Threshold Prediction in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Participants Using Mixed Multiple ASSR.
    Israelsson KE, Bogo R, Berninger E.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):299-310. PubMed ID: 25751697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Predicting the degree of hearing loss using click auditory brainstem response in babies referred from newborn hearing screening.
    Baldwin M, Watkin P.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Mar; 34(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 23340456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP, Johnson TA, Kaminski JR, Beauchaine KL, Garner CA, Neely ST.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Adults with auditory neuropathy: comparison of auditory steady-state response and pure-tone audiometry.
    Jafari Z, Malayeri S, Ashayeri H, Farahani MA.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Feb; 20(10):621-8. PubMed ID: 20503800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Further efforts to predict pure-tone thresholds from distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions.
    Gorga MP, Neely ST, Dorn PA, Hoover BM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jun; 113(6):3275-84. PubMed ID: 12822800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM, Phillips DS, Fausti SA, Gordon JS, Helt WJ, Wilmington D, Bratt GW, Konrad-Martin D.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of audiometric threshold shift criteria for ototoxicity monitoring.
    Konrad-Martin D, James KE, Gordon JS, Reavis KM, Phillips DS, Bratt GW, Fausti SA.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 May; 21(5):301-14; quiz 357. PubMed ID: 20569665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Fixed-Level Frequency Threshold Testing for Ototoxicity Monitoring.
    Rieke CC, Clavier OH, Allen LV, Anderson AP, Brooks CA, Fellows AM, Brungart DS, Buckey JC.
    Ear Hear; 2017 May; 38(6):e369-e375. PubMed ID: 28362673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Are There Cochlear Dead Regions Involved in Hearing Loss after Cisplatin Ototoxicity?
    Schultz C, Pecora Liberman PH, Schmidt Goffi-Gomez MV.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019 May; 24(5):253-257. PubMed ID: 31661686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Maturation of the occlusion effect: a bone conduction auditory steady state response study in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Small SA, Hu N.
    Ear Hear; 2011 May; 32(6):708-19. PubMed ID: 21617531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Verification of in situ thresholds and integrated real-ear measurements.
    Digiovanni JJ, Pratt RM.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 May; 21(10):663-70. PubMed ID: 21376007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A Cross-Sectional Study on the Hearing Threshold Levels Among People in Qinling, Qinghai, and Nanjing, China.
    Wang J, Qian X, Chen J, Yang Y, Gao X.
    Am J Audiol; 2018 Mar 08; 27(1):147-155. PubMed ID: 29490364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Behavioral hearing thresholds between 0.125 and 20 kHz using depth-compensated ear simulator calibration.
    Lee J, Dhar S, Abel R, Banakis R, Grolley E, Lee J, Zecker S, Siegel J.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Mar 08; 33(3):315-29. PubMed ID: 22436407
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.