These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

346 related items for PubMed ID: 24836535

  • 1. Fracture force of cantilevered zirconia frameworks: an in vitro study.
    Chong KK, Palamara J, Wong RH, Judge RB.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):849-56. PubMed ID: 24836535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
    Foong JK, Judge RB, Palamara JE, Swain MV.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
    Kim JS, Raigrodski AJ, Flinn BD, Rubenstein JE, Chung KH, Mancl LA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses.
    de França DG, Morais MH, das Neves FD, Barbosa GA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 25277028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A load-to-fracture and strain analysis of monolithic zirconia cantilevered frameworks.
    Alshahrani FA, Yilmaz B, Seidt JD, McGlumphy EA, Brantley WA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Dec; 118(6):752-758. PubMed ID: 28506651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. In vitro performance of zirconia and titanium implant/abutment systems for anterior application.
    Rosentritt M, Hagemann A, Hahnel S, Behr M, Preis V.
    J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):1019-26. PubMed ID: 24699071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Postfatigue fracture resistance of modified prefabricated zirconia implant abutments.
    Alqahtani F, Flinton R.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):299-305. PubMed ID: 24461943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
    Larsson C.
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011 Aug; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Inlay-retained cantilever fixed dental prostheses to substitute a single premolar: impact of zirconia framework design after dynamic loading.
    Shahin R, Tannous F, Kern M.
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2014 Aug; 122(4):310-6. PubMed ID: 24910293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of cyclic loading on the vertical microgap of long-span zirconia frameworks supported by 4 or 6 implants.
    Tiossi R, Gomes EA, Lapria Faria AC, Silveira Rodrigues RC, Ribeiro RF.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):828-33. PubMed ID: 24795260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. An in vitro comparison of fracture load of zirconia custom abutments with internal connection and different angulations and thickness: part I.
    Albosefi A, Finkelman M, Zandparsa R.
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):296-301. PubMed ID: 24417713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments.
    Kolbeck C, Behr M, Rosentritt M, Handel G.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1049-53. PubMed ID: 18707604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ, Tan KB, Nicholls JI.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Oct; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Influence of implant abutment angulations on the fracture resistance of overlaying CAM-milled zirconia single crowns.
    Ellakwa A, Raj T, Deeb S, Ronaghi G, Martin FE, Klineberg I.
    Aust Dent J; 2011 Jun; 56(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 21623803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Fracture Load of CAD/CAM Fabricated Cantilever Implant-Supported Zirconia Framework: An In Vitro Study.
    Alshiddi IF, Habib SR, Zafar MS, Bajunaid S, Labban N, Alsarhan M.
    Molecules; 2021 Apr 13; 26(8):. PubMed ID: 33924733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Karl M, Graef F, Wichmann M, Krafft T.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr 13; 107(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 22475466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of framework design on fracture resistance in zirconia 4-unit all-ceramic fixed partial dentures.
    Takuma Y, Nomoto S, Sato T, Sugihara N.
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2013 Apr 13; 54(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 24334628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of framework shape on the fracture strength of implant-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in the molar region.
    Tsumita M, Kokubo Y, Vult von Steyern P, Fukushima S.
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun 13; 17(4):274-85. PubMed ID: 18205740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of engaging abutment position in implant-borne, screw-retained three-unit fixed cantilevered prostheses.
    Dogus SM, Kurtz KS, Watanabe I, Griggs JA.
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jul 13; 20(5):348-54. PubMed ID: 21585587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Fracture strength of yttria-stabilized zirconium-dioxide (Y-TZP) fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) with different abutment core thicknesses and connector dimensions.
    Ambré MJ, Aschan F, Vult von Steyern P.
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul 13; 22(5):377-82. PubMed ID: 23289522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.