These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
88 related items for PubMed ID: 2488971
1. [Assessment of sensing parameters in the rate responsive cardiac pacemaker]. Saito H, Toyoshima T, Tamura T, Su SC, Togawa T, Suma K. Tokyo Ika Shika Daigaku Iyo Kizai Kenkyusho Hokoku; 1989; 23():97-103. PubMed ID: 2488971 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the pacing rate response to treadmill exercise using computer simulation of a temperature-based, rate-adaptive algorithm. Evans ML, Fearnot NE. Med Instrum; 1988 Aug; 22(4):182-8. PubMed ID: 3173171 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. First clinical results with a new temperature-controlled rate-responsive pacemaker. Comparison of Activitrax and Nova MR pacemakers with VVI/AAI pacing. Alt E, Völker R, Högl B, MacCarter D. Circulation; 1988 Nov; 78(5 Pt 2):III116-24. PubMed ID: 3180390 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hemodynamic advantages of temperature sensing rate adaptive pacemaker. Rao G. Int Surg; 1993 Nov; 78(3):262-5. PubMed ID: 8276555 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical experience with a new rate-responsive TX pacemaker. Yasuno M, Nishino Y, Nishino M, Akashi T, Tanahashi H, Kobayashi K, Yamada Y, Inoue M. Angiology; 1986 Dec; 37(12 Pt 1):888-95. PubMed ID: 3813117 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation by serial standardized testing of a new rate-responsive pacemaker sensor based on variations in myocardial contractility. Clémenty J, Kobeissi A, Garrigue S, Jaïs P, Le Métayer P, Haïssaguerre M. Europace; 2001 Apr; 3(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 11333049 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR]. Occhetta E, Perucca A, Fazzari M, Pistis G, Baduini G, Trevi G. Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimal atrioventricular delay setting determined by evoked QT interval in patients with implanted stimulus-T-driven DDDR pacemakers. Ishikawa T, Sugano T, Sumita S, Nakagawa T, Hanada K, Kosuge M, Kobayashi I, Kimura K, Tochikubo O, Usui T, Umemura S. Europace; 2001 Jan; 3(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 11271951 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Chronotropic incompetence: when should a pacemaker be considered? Which pacing system and which settings?]. Copie X, Lascault G. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 2000 Jul; 49(4):218-23. PubMed ID: 12555482 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the quality of rate adaptation algorithms for cardiac pacing. Lass J, Kaik J, Meigas K, Hinrikus H, Blinowska A. Europace; 2001 Jul; 3(3):221-8. PubMed ID: 11467464 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]