These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Corticospinal excitability, assessed through stimulus response curves, is phase-, task-, and muscle-dependent during arm cycling. Forman DA, Monks M, Power KE. Neurosci Lett; 2019 Jan 23; 692():100-106. PubMed ID: 30399398 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cadence-dependent changes in corticospinal excitability of the biceps brachii during arm cycling. Forman DA, Philpott DT, Button DC, Power KE. J Neurophysiol; 2015 Oct 23; 114(4):2285-94. PubMed ID: 26289462 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Premovement Changes in Corticospinal Excitability of the Biceps Brachii are Not Different Between Arm Cycling and an Intensity-Matched Tonic Contraction. Copithorne DB, Forman DA, Power KE. Motor Control; 2015 Jul 23; 19(3):223-41. PubMed ID: 25387357 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Chronic resistance training enhances the spinal excitability of the biceps brachii in the non-dominant arm at moderate contraction intensities. Philpott DT, Pearcey GE, Forman D, Power KE, Button DC. Neurosci Lett; 2015 Jan 12; 585():12-6. PubMed ID: 25445370 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Elbow angle modulates corticospinal excitability to the resting biceps brachii at both spinal and supraspinal levels. Dongés SC, Taylor JL, Nuzzo JL. Exp Physiol; 2019 Apr 12; 104(4):546-555. PubMed ID: 30690803 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Phase- and Workload-Dependent Changes in Corticospinal Excitability to the Biceps and Triceps Brachii during Arm Cycling. Spence AJ, Alcock LR, Lockyer EJ, Button DC, Power KE. Brain Sci; 2016 Dec 15; 6(4):. PubMed ID: 27983685 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reductions in motoneuron excitability during sustained isometric contractions are dependent on stimulus and contraction intensity. Brownstein CG, Espeit L, Royer N, Ansdell P, Škarabot J, Souron R, Lapole T, Millet GY. J Neurophysiol; 2021 May 01; 125(5):1636-1646. PubMed ID: 33788627 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Increased corticospinal excitability prior to arm cycling is due to enhanced supraspinal but not spinal motoneurone excitability. Power KE, Copithorne DB. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2013 Nov 01; 38(11):1154-61. PubMed ID: 24053523 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Muscle length and joint angle influence spinal but not corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii across forearm postures. Forman DA, Abdel-Malek D, Bunce CMF, Holmes MWR. J Neurophysiol; 2019 Jul 01; 122(1):413-423. PubMed ID: 31116661 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Corticospinal excitability is lower during rhythmic arm movement than during tonic contraction. Carroll TJ, Baldwin ER, Collins DF, Zehr EP. J Neurophysiol; 2006 Feb 01; 95(2):914-21. PubMed ID: 16251263 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]