These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

257 related items for PubMed ID: 2490243

  • 1. [Control of vertical dimension in the treatment of Class II malocclusion using a combined activator and extraoral traction appliance].
    Chabre C.
    Orthod Fr; 1989; 60 Pt 2():617-33. PubMed ID: 2490243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G.
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Treatment of Class II open bite in the mixed dentition with a removable functional appliance and headgear.
    Ngan P, Wilson S, Florman M, Wei SH.
    Quintessence Int; 1992 May; 23(5):323-33. PubMed ID: 1502307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP, da Rosa Martins JC, Martins LP, Buschang PH.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Effects of activator and activator + anterior high-pull headgear on the growth direction of Class 2 cases].
    Uner O, Akkaya S, Buyruk F.
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Apr; 2(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 2489150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: comparison with untreated Class II subjects.
    Türkkahraman H, Sayin MO.
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16093256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Evaluation of the changes occurring in the vertical direction of the face in cases treated with activator + occipital headgear combination].
    Altuğ Z, Işeri H, Bayazit Z, Gögen H.
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 2489156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Cephalometric evaluation of two treatment strategies for deep overbite correction.
    Hans MG, Kishiyama C, Parker SH, Wolf GR, Noachtar R.
    Angle Orthod; 1994 Nov; 64(4):265-74; discussion 275-6. PubMed ID: 7978521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN, Rodrigues de Almeida R, Rodrigues de Almeida M, de Oliveira JN.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I, Shoji T, Mizoguchi I.
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.