These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

170 related items for PubMed ID: 24917904

  • 1. Advantages of binaural amplification to acceptable noise level of directional hearing aid users.
    Kim JH, Lee JH, Lee HK.
    Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Jun; 7(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 24917904
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The effect of presentation level on normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' acceptable speech and noise levels.
    Recker KL, Edwards BW.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 23231813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Loudness as a cue for acceptable noise levels.
    Recker KL, McKinney MF, Edwards BW.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Jun; 25(6):605-23. PubMed ID: 25313550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Acceptance of noise with monaural and binaural amplification.
    Freyaldenhoven MC, Plyler PN, Thelin JW, Burchfield SB.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Oct; 17(9):659-66. PubMed ID: 17039768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model.
    Wu YH, Stangl E, Pang C, Zhang X.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 24828215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of speech perception in background noise with acceptance of background noise in aided and unaided conditions.
    Nabelek AK, Tampas JW, Burchfield SB.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Oct; 47(5):1001-11. PubMed ID: 15603458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The effects of noise reduction technologies on the acceptance of background noise.
    Lowery KJ, Plyler PN.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):649-59. PubMed ID: 24131601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The effect of different cochlear implant microphones on acoustic hearing individuals' binaural benefits for speech perception in noise.
    Aronoff JM, Freed DJ, Fisher LM, Pal I, Soli SD.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Sep; 32(4):468-84. PubMed ID: 21412155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The Acceptable Noise Level Benefit From Directionality for Listeners With Severe Hearing Loss.
    Aghsoleimani M, Jalilvand H, Mahdavi ME, Nazeri AR, Kamali M.
    Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Sep; 11(3):166-173. PubMed ID: 29519120
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The impact of head angle on monaural and binaural performance with directional and omnidirectional hearing aids.
    Ricketts T.
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):318-28. PubMed ID: 10981608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Type of Speech Material Affects Acceptable Noise Level Test Outcome.
    Koch X, Dingemanse G, Goedegebure A, Janse E.
    Front Psychol; 2016 Aug; 7():186. PubMed ID: 26952145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Preferences for digital noise reduction and microphone mode settings in hearing-impaired listeners with low and high tolerances for background noise.
    Recker K, Goyette A, Galster J.
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Feb; 59(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 31575306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Intertester reliability of the acceptable noise level.
    Gordon-Hickey S, Adams E, Moore R, Gaal A, Berry K, Brock S.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Feb; 23(7):534-41. PubMed ID: 22992260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Acceptable noise levels in preschool children with normal hearing.
    Bryan MF, Franklin C, Ware KS, Horne R.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):823-31; quiz 891-2. PubMed ID: 24224989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Speech Intelligibility as a Cue for Acceptable Noise Levels.
    Recker KL, Micheyl C.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Oct; 38(4):465-474. PubMed ID: 28169839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Measurement of Acceptable Noise Level with Background Music.
    Ahn HJ, Bahng J, Lee JH.
    J Audiol Otol; 2015 Sep; 19(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 26413573
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The acceptance of background noise in adult cochlear implant users.
    Plyler PN, Bahng J, von Hapsburg D.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):502-15. PubMed ID: 18367692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Relationship Between Auditory and Visual Noise Acceptance in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    Faulkner KF, Plyler PN, Easterday MK, Slade TM.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Feb; 31(2):118-128. PubMed ID: 31287056
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Factors underlying masking release by voice-gender differences and spatial separation cues in multi-talker listening environments in listeners with and without hearing loss.
    Oh Y, Hartling CL, Srinivasan NK, Diedesch AC, Gallun FJ, Reiss LAJ.
    Front Neurosci; 2022 Feb; 16():1059639. PubMed ID: 36507363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction on Subcortical and Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials in Older Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Slugocki C, Kuk F, Korhonen P.
    Ear Hear; 2020 Feb; 41(5):1282-1293. PubMed ID: 32058351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.