These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

412 related items for PubMed ID: 24925671

  • 1. Comparison of four different categories of prosthetic feet during ramp ambulation in unilateral transtibial amputees.
    Agrawal V, Gailey RS, Gaunaurd IA, O'Toole C, Finnieston A, Tolchin R.
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Oct; 39(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 24925671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison between microprocessor-controlled ankle/foot and conventional prosthetic feet during stair negotiation in people with unilateral transtibial amputation.
    Agrawal V, Gailey RS, Gaunaurd IA, O'Toole C, Finnieston AA.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013 Oct; 50(7):941-50. PubMed ID: 24301431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Biomechanical analysis of ramp ambulation of transtibial amputees with an adaptive ankle foot system.
    Fradet L, Alimusaj M, Braatz F, Wolf SI.
    Gait Posture; 2010 Jun; 32(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 20457526
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Application of self-report and performance-based outcome measures to determine functional differences between four categories of prosthetic feet.
    Gailey RS, Gaunaurd I, Agrawal V, Finnieston A, O'Toole C, Tolchin R.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012 Jun; 49(4):597-612. PubMed ID: 22773262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The effect of prosthetic foot stiffness on foot-ankle biomechanics and relative foot stiffness perception in people with transtibial amputation.
    Halsne EG, Czerniecki JM, Shofer JB, Morgenroth DC.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2020 Dec; 80():105141. PubMed ID: 32763624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The efficacy of the Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic Foot prototype 4.0 during walking: Physiological determinants.
    De Pauw K, Cherelle P, Roelands B, Lefeber D, Meeusen R.
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Oct; 42(5):504-510. PubMed ID: 29623812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The effect of foot and ankle prosthetic components on braking and propulsive impulses during transtibial amputee gait.
    Zmitrewicz RJ, Neptune RR, Walden JG, Rogers WE, Bosker GW.
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 87(10):1334-9. PubMed ID: 17023242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.