These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

211 related items for PubMed ID: 24939269

  • 1. The effect of mechanical loading on the cusp defection of premolars restored with direct and indirect techniques.
    Zamboni SC, Nogueira L, Bottino MA, Sobrinho LC, Valandro LF.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jan 01; 15(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 24939269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of resin cements and aging on cuspal deflection and fracture resistance of teeth restored with composite resin inlays.
    Salaverry A, Borges GA, Mota EG, Burnett Júnior LH, Spohr AM.
    J Adhes Dent; 2013 Dec 01; 15(6):561-8. PubMed ID: 23653900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
    Shor A, Nicholls JI, Phillips KM, Libman WJ.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003 Dec 01; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with class II MOD cavities restored with Ormocer, Nanofilled, and Nanoceramic composite restorative systems.
    Taha DG, Abdel-Samad AA, Mahmoud SH.
    Quintessence Int; 2011 Dec 01; 42(7):579-87. PubMed ID: 21716986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C, Westphal C, Becker K, Attin T.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct 01; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Influence of restorative techniques on fracture load of endodontically treated premolars.
    Bianchi E Silva AA, Ghiggi PC, Mota EG, Borges GA, Burnett LH, Spohr AM.
    Stomatologija; 2013 Oct 01; 15(4):123-8. PubMed ID: 24589635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite: an in vitro study.
    Desai PD, Das UK.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011 Oct 01; 22(6):877. PubMed ID: 22484893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
    Taha NA, Palamara JE, Messer HH.
    J Dent; 2012 Aug 01; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Overlays or ceramic fragments for tooth restoration: an analysis of fracture resistance.
    Tavarez RR, Firoozmand LM, Silva MB, Malheiros AS, Bandéca MC.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jan 01; 15(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 24939265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations.
    Taha NA, Palamara JE, Messer HH.
    J Dent; 2011 Aug 01; 39(8):527-35. PubMed ID: 21620926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Pressable feldspathic inlays in premolars: effect of cementation strategy and mechanical cycling on the adhesive bond between dentin and restoration.
    Feitosa SA, Corazza PH, Cesar PF, Bottino MA, Valandro LF.
    J Adhes Dent; 2014 Apr 01; 16(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 24027771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Fatigue Failure Load of Restored Premolars: Effect of Etching the Intaglio Surface of Ceramic Inlays With Hydrofluoric Acid at Different Concentrations.
    Missau T, Venturini AB, Pereira G, Prochnow C, Valandro LF, Rippe MP.
    Oper Dent; 2018 Apr 01; 43(2):E81-E91. PubMed ID: 29504886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The effect of glass ionomer cement or composite resin bases on restoration of cuspal stiffness of endodontically treated premolars in vitro.
    Hofmann N, Just N, Haller B, Hugo B, Klaiber B.
    Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Jun 01; 2(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 15490780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK, Unlu N, Cetin AR, Ozkan HB.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Jun 01; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements.
    Mota CS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, Powers JM.
    J Adhes Dent; 2003 Jun 01; 5(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12729085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The effect of cuspal coverage on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect composite resin restorations.
    Burke FJ, Wilson NH, Watts DC.
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Dec 01; 24(12):875-80. PubMed ID: 20830883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Tensile bond strength and flexural modulus of resin cements--influence on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlays.
    Habekost Lde V, Camacho GB, Demarco FF, Powers JM.
    Oper Dent; 2007 Dec 01; 32(5):488-95. PubMed ID: 17910226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study.
    Kalburge V, Yakub SS, Kalburge J, Hiremath H, Chandurkar A.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013 Dec 01; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Strain measurements and fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with all-ceramic restorations.
    Seow LL, Toh CG, Wilson NH.
    J Dent; 2015 Jan 01; 43(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 25448436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques.
    Santos MJ, Bezerra RB.
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep 01; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.