These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

283 related items for PubMed ID: 24953883

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Evaluating noise in social context: the effect of procedural unfairness on noise annoyance judgments.
    Maris E, Stallen PJ, Vermunt R, Steensma H.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3483-94. PubMed ID: 18247757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. [Assessment of low frequency noise annoyance in steering premises according to subjective annoyance rating by workers. A pilot study].
    Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska M, Dudarewicz A, Waszkowska M.
    Med Pr; 2001 Dec; 52(6):465-70. PubMed ID: 11928677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Railway noise annoyance and the importance of number of trains, ground vibration, and building situational factors.
    Gidlöf-Gunnarsson A, Ögren M, Jerson T, Öhrström E.
    Noise Health; 2012 Dec; 14(59):190-201. PubMed ID: 22918150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Noise exposure while commuting in Toronto - a study of personal and public transportation in Toronto.
    Yao CMKL, Ma AK, Cushing SL, Lin VYW.
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Nov 23; 46(1):62. PubMed ID: 29166946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Exposure-response relationships for annoyance due to freight and passenger railway vibration exposure in residential environments.
    Sharp C, Woodcock J, Sica G, Peris E, Moorhouse AT, Waddington DC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan 23; 135(1):205-12. PubMed ID: 24437760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. The relationship between urban combined traffic noise and annoyance: an investigation in Dalian, north of China.
    Di G, Liu X, Lin Q, Zheng Y, He L.
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Aug 15; 432():189-94. PubMed ID: 22728964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Road traffic noise, annoyance and community health survey - a case study for an Indian city.
    Agarwal S, Swami BL.
    Noise Health; 2011 Aug 15; 13(53):272-6. PubMed ID: 21768730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Measuring subjective response to aircraft noise: the effects of survey context.
    Kroesen M, Molin EJ, van Wee B.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan 15; 133(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 23297898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.