These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

335 related items for PubMed ID: 24954763

  • 1. Load transfer in Christensen(®) TMJ in alloplastic total joint replacement for two different mouth apertures.
    Ramos A, Mesnard M.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1442-9. PubMed ID: 24954763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of load transfers in TMJ replacement using a standard and a custom-made temporal component.
    Ramos A, Mesnard M.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1766-72. PubMed ID: 25009108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Theoretical assessment of an intramedullary condylar component versus screw fixation for the condylar component of a hemiarthroplasty alloplastic TMJ replacement system.
    Ramos A, Mesnard M, Relvas C, Completo A, Simões JA.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 42(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 23684530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Development of a mandibular motion simulator for total joint replacement.
    Celebi N, Rohner EC, Gateno J, Noble PC, Ismaily SK, Teichgraeber JF, Xia JJ.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 69(1):66-79. PubMed ID: 21050636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Prediction at long-term condyle screw fixation of temporomandibular joint implant: A numerical study.
    Ramos A, Duarte RJ, Mesnard M.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 43(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 25819477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The stock alloplastic temporomandibular joint implant can influence the behavior of the opposite native joint: A numerical study.
    Ramos AM, Mesnard M.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1384-91. PubMed ID: 26231883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Christensen vs Biomet Microfixation alloplastic TMJ implant: Are there improvements? A numerical study.
    Ramos A, Mesnard M.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1398-403. PubMed ID: 26300296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Finite element analysis of a condylar support prosthesis to replace the temporomandibular joint.
    Abel EW, Hilgers A, McLoughlin PM.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 53(4):352-7. PubMed ID: 25703687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Straight, semi-anatomic and anatomic TMJ implants: the influence of condylar geometry and bone fixation screws.
    Ramos A, Completo A, Relvas C, Mesnard M, Simões JA.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 39(5):343-50. PubMed ID: 20801667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Influences of implant condyle geometry on bone and screw strains in a temporomandibular implant.
    Mesnard M, Ramos A, Simões JA.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 23726645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Ex-vivo and in vitro validation of an innovative mandibular condyle implant concept.
    Ramos A, Gonzalez-Perez LM, Infante-Cossio P, Mesnard M.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 47(1):112-119. PubMed ID: 30545800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Prosthesis loading after temporomandibular joint replacement surgery: a musculoskeletal modeling study.
    Ackland DC, Moskaljuk A, Hart C, Vee Sin Lee P, Dimitroulis G.
    J Biomech Eng; 2015 Apr; 137(4):041001. PubMed ID: 25565306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Strain induced in the condyle by self-tapping screws in the Biomet alloplastic temporomandibular joint: a preliminary experimental study.
    Ramos A, Duarte RJ, Mesnard M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 44(11):1376-82. PubMed ID: 26194773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Finite element analysis of stresses in the maxillary and mandibular dental arches and TMJ articular discs during clenching into maximum intercuspation, anterior and unilateral posterior occlusion.
    Pileicikiene G, Surna A, Barauskas R, Surna R, Basevicius A.
    Stomatologija; 2007 Nov; 9(4):121-8. PubMed ID: 18303277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Biomechanical analysis comparing natural and alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement using a finite element model.
    Mesnard M, Ramos A, Ballu A, Morlier J, Cid M, Simoes JA.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 69(4):1008-17. PubMed ID: 20674129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The influence of the closing and opening muscle groups of jaw condyle biomechanics after mandible bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Xiangdong QI, Limin MA, Shizhen Z.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 40(6):e159-64. PubMed ID: 21907586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of screw fixation on temporomandibular joint condylar prosthesis.
    Hsu JT, Huang HL, Tsai MT, Fuh LJ, Tu MG.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 May; 69(5):1320-8. PubMed ID: 21216062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the cartilaginous structures in the human temporomandibular joint.
    Beek M, Koolstra JH, van Ruijven LJ, van Eijden TM.
    J Dent Res; 2001 Oct; 80(10):1913-8. PubMed ID: 11706951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Stability study of total temporomandibular joint replacement on sheep.
    Shen P, Zhang SY, Yang C, Yun B.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1265-70. PubMed ID: 24780351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.