These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

128 related items for PubMed ID: 2496014

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The muddle over screening breast Ca.
    Thomas P.
    Med World News; 1988 May 09; 29(9):34-6, 42, 47-8. PubMed ID: 10312486
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Is mammography screening efficient?].
    von Eyben FE.
    Lakartidningen; 1999 Nov 03; 96(44):4778-9. PubMed ID: 10584538
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Mammographic screening: does it work?
    Handler S.
    Minn Med; 2003 Dec 03; 86(12):6-7. PubMed ID: 14719608
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The feasibility of breast cancer screening.
    Health Technol; 1987 Dec 03; 1(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 10311915
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Offering mammography is beneficial in the long run].
    Cederblom S.
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Dec 20; 92(51-52):4865-8. PubMed ID: 8544497
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Setting calculations aside.
    Meyer CR.
    Minn Med; 2003 Dec 20; 86(12):2. PubMed ID: 14719607
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Low-cost mass screening with mammography as a means of reducing overall mortality from breast cancer.
    McLelland R.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep 20; 25(5):1007-13. PubMed ID: 3306771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Psychological advantages and disadvantages of mammography screenings].
    Absetz P, Aro AR.
    Duodecim; 2003 Sep 20; 119(22):2138-44. PubMed ID: 14702798
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Mammoscam.
    Randal J.
    N C Med J; 1993 May 20; 54(5):194-5; discussion 196-9. PubMed ID: 8510774
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. What are the benefits and costs of screening mammograms on Kentucky women aged 40-49?
    Spratt JS, Gaines BM, Aaron WS, Cerrito P.
    J Surg Oncol; 1996 Oct 20; 63(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 8888797
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The National Study of Breast Cancer Screening Protocol for a Canadian Randomized Controlled trial of screening for breast cancer in women.
    Miller AB, Howe GR, Wall C.
    Clin Invest Med; 1981 Oct 20; 4(3-4):227-58. PubMed ID: 6802546
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Mammography screening in Germany: how, when and why?].
    Bick U.
    Rofo; 2006 Oct 20; 178(10):957-69. PubMed ID: 17021975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Screening for breast cancer after the age of 70: effect on breast cancer mortality].
    van Dijck JA, Verbeek AL, Hendriks JH, Holland R.
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1995 Mar 04; 139(9):428-33. PubMed ID: 7891764
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Mammography screening. Senselessly squandered money?].
    Rautenstrauch J.
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2000 Mar 23; 142(12):4-8. PubMed ID: 10804710
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Mammography screening as early detection measure. Pro].
    Koch MG.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1996 Mar 23; 259 Suppl 1():S161-77. PubMed ID: 9133270
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. American Cancer Society: Cost of screening mammography. Issues, recommendations, and solutions.
    Cancer; 1987 Oct 01; 60(7 Suppl):1694-9. PubMed ID: 3651997
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.