These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

67 related items for PubMed ID: 2497496

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Follow-up as an alternative to biopsy for probably benign mammographically detected abnormalities.
    Brenner RJ.
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):588-92. PubMed ID: 1888655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Regarding trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography.
    Ellis RL.
    Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):375-6; author reply 376. PubMed ID: 16373783
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted?
    Graf O, Helbich TH, Fuchsjaeger MH, Hopf G, Morgun M, Graf C, Mallek R, Sickles EA.
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):850-6. PubMed ID: 15486217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography in an academic practice.
    Gur D, Wallace LP, Klym AH, Hardesty LA, Abrams GS, Shah R, Sumkin JH.
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):396-401. PubMed ID: 15770039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Follow-up of women treated for breast cancer. State of the art].
    Lansac J, Diouf A.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1998 Jan; 27(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 9583042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Management of probably benign breast lesions.
    Sickles EA.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1123-30. PubMed ID: 7480660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States.
    Burnside E, Belkora J, Esserman L.
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2001 Jul; 2(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 11899786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Probably benign lesions at breast magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary experience in high-risk women.
    Liberman L, Morris EA, Benton CL, Abramson AF, Dershaw DD.
    Cancer; 2003 Jul 15; 98(2):377-88. PubMed ID: 12872360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Early detection of breast cancer in women.
    Humphrey LL, Ballard DJ.
    Prim Care; 1989 Mar 15; 16(1):115-32. PubMed ID: 2495540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Mammographic screening: does it work?
    Handler S.
    Minn Med; 2003 Dec 15; 86(12):6-7. PubMed ID: 14719608
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.