These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

356 related items for PubMed ID: 24993215

  • 1. Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity for hearing-impaired listeners: dependence on carrier center frequency and the relationship to speech intelligibility.
    Mehraei G, Gallun FJ, Leek MR, Bernstein JG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul; 136(1):301-16. PubMed ID: 24993215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG, Mehraei G, Shamma S, Gallun FJ, Theodoroff SM, Leek MR.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):293-306. PubMed ID: 23636210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG, Summers V, Grassi E, Grant KW.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Summers V, Makashay MJ, Theodoroff SM, Leek MR.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D, Ahlstrom JB, Bologna WJ, Dubno JR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Adaptation to Noise in Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection and Word Recognition.
    López-Ramos D, Marrufo-Pérez MI, Eustaquio-Martín A, López-Bascuas LE, Lopez-Poveda EA.
    Trends Hear; 2024 Jun; 28():23312165241266322. PubMed ID: 39267369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity as a Predictor of Speech-Reception Performance in Noise With Hearing Aids.
    Bernstein JG, Danielsson H, Hällgren M, Stenfelt S, Rönnberg J, Lunner T.
    Trends Hear; 2016 Nov 04; 20():. PubMed ID: 27815546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Saripella R, Loizou PC, Thibodeau L, Alford JA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov 04; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug 04; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Detection threshold for sound distortion resulting from noise reduction in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Brons I, Dreschler WA, Houben R.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep 04; 136(3):1375. PubMed ID: 25190410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
    D'Aquila LA, Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD.
    Trends Hear; 2017 Sep 04; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing.
    Oxenham AJ, Kreft HA.
    Trends Hear; 2014 Oct 13; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Use of high-rate envelope speech cues and their perceptually relevant dynamic range for the hearing impaired.
    Stone MA, Anton K, Moore BC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug 13; 132(2):1141-51. PubMed ID: 22894233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection and Speech Perception by Cochlear Implant Users.
    Won JH, Moon IJ, Jin S, Park H, Woo J, Cho YS, Chung WH, Hong SH.
    PLoS One; 2015 Aug 13; 10(10):e0140920. PubMed ID: 26485715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise.
    Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD, Perez ZD, Delhorne LA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul 13; 128(1):342-59. PubMed ID: 20649229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A correlational method to concurrently measure envelope and temporal fine structure weights: effects of age, cochlear pathology, and spectral shaping.
    Fogerty D, Humes LE.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep 13; 132(3):1679-89. PubMed ID: 22978896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW, Walden TC.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr 13; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
    Zamaninezhad L, Hohmann V, Büchner A, Schädler MR, Jürgens T.
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb 13; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The Effects of Static and Moving Spectral Ripple Sensitivity on Unaided and Aided Speech Perception in Noise.
    Miller CW, Bernstein JGW, Zhang X, Wu YH, Bentler RA, Tremblay K.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Dec 10; 61(12):3113-3126. PubMed ID: 30515519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D, Kewley-Port D, Humes LE.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep 10; 132(3):1667-78. PubMed ID: 22978895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.