These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

567 related items for PubMed ID: 25010636

  • 1. Perceptual consequences of different signal changes due to binaural noise reduction: do hearing loss and working memory capacity play a role?
    Neher T, Grimm G, Hohmann V.
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e213-27. PubMed ID: 25010636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?
    Neher T, Grimm G, Hohmann V, Kollmeier B.
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e52-62. PubMed ID: 24351610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM, Ricketts TA, Hornsby BW.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM, Aspell E, Ricketts TA.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Sep; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL, Pichora-Fuller MK, Wilson RH, Macdonald EN.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Sep; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
    Dawes P, Munro KJ, Kalluri S, Edwards B.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Sep; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
    Picou EM, Ricketts TA.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Sep; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Directional Processing and Noise Reduction in Hearing Aids: Individual and Situational Influences on Preferred Setting.
    Neher T, Wagener KC, Fischer RL.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Sep; 27(8):628-46. PubMed ID: 27564441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Working memory capacity may influence perceived effort during aided speech recognition in noise.
    Rudner M, Lunner T, Behrens T, Thorén ES, Rönnberg J.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):577-89. PubMed ID: 22967733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. An Integrative Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Directional Microphone and Noise-Reduction Algorithm under Realistic Signal-to-Noise Ratios.
    Kuk F, Slugocki C, Korhonen P.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Apr; 31(4):262-270. PubMed ID: 31589137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
    de Taillez T, Grimm G, Kollmeier B, Neher T.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 29.