These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

163 related items for PubMed ID: 25010882

  • 1. Performance of fast-setting impression materials in the reproduction of subgingival tooth surfaces without soft tissue retraction.
    Rudolph H, Röhl A, Walter MH, Luthardt RG, Quaas S.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(4):366-75. PubMed ID: 25010882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. An in vitro study on the dimensional stability of a vinyl polyether silicone impression material over a prolonged storage period.
    Nassar U, Oko A, Adeeb S, El-Rich M, Flores-Mir C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 23522366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
    Persson AS, Odén A, Andersson M, Sandborgh-Englund G.
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Randomized controlled clinical study on the accuracy of two-stage putty-and-wash impression materials.
    Haim M, Luthardt RG, Rudolph H, Koch R, Walter MH, Quaas S.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 22(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 19548415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX, Bakopoulou A, Hirayama H, Garefis DP, Garefis PD.
    J Prosthodont; 2007 Jul; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Randomized controlled clinical trial on the three-dimensional accuracy of fast-set impression materials.
    Rudolph H, Quaas S, Haim M, Preißler J, Walter MH, Koch R, Luthardt RG.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jun; 17(5):1397-406. PubMed ID: 22936298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Influence of disinfection with peracetic acid and hypochlorite in dimensional alterations of casts obtained from addition silicone and polyether impressions.
    Queiroz DA, Peçanha MM, Neves AC, Frizzera F, Tonetto MR, Silva-Concílio LR.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov 01; 14(6):1100-5. PubMed ID: 24858758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The influence of five impression techniques on the dimensional accuracy of master models.
    Fenske C.
    Braz Dent J; 2000 Nov 01; 11(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 11210270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S, Varvara G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr 01; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials.
    Wadhwani CP, Johnson GH, Lepe X, Raigrodski AJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun 01; 93(6):530-9. PubMed ID: 15942613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.
    Forrester-Baker L, Seymour KG, Samarawickrama D, Zou L, Cherukara G, Patel M.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun 01; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of dental arch reproduction using three-dimensional optical digitization.
    Brosky ME, Major RJ, DeLong R, Hodges JS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Nov 01; 90(5):434-40. PubMed ID: 14586306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of the precision of three implant transfer impression techniques using two elastomeric impression materials.
    Mostafa TM, Elgendy MN, Kashef NA, Halim MM.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010 Nov 01; 23(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 21209987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of different methods of optical impression making on the marginal gap of onlays created with CEREC 3D.
    da Costa JB, Pelogia F, Hagedorn B, Ferracane JL.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Nov 01; 35(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 20533633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.