These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
242 related items for PubMed ID: 25033348
1. Calcification of the stylohyoid ligament in panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography among patients referred for dental implant treatment planning. Mahdian M, Moghaddam EJ, Alzahrani A, Rengasamy K, Tadinada A. Implant Dent; 2014 Aug; 23(4):508-13. PubMed ID: 25033348 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images. Correa LR, Spin-Neto R, Stavropoulos A, Schropp L, da Silveira HE, Wenzel A. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 23442085 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of dental implants in periapical and panoramic radiographs and cone beam computed tomography images: a clinical study. Felix RP, Shinkai RSA, Rockenbach MIB. Gen Dent; 2018 Jun; 66(2):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 29513241 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Stylohyoid Ligament Calcification and Its Association With Dental Diseases. Al-Amad SH, Al Bayatti S, Alshamsi HA. Int Dent J; 2023 Feb; 73(1):151-156. PubMed ID: 35902309 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Incidental findings in the neck region of dental implant patients: a comparison between panoramic radiography and CBCT. Mandian M, Tadinada A. J Mass Dent Soc; 2014 Feb; 63(2):42-5. PubMed ID: 25226773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study. Sahota J, Bhatia A, Gupta M, Singh V, Soni J, Soni R. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug 01; 18(8):665-669. PubMed ID: 28816186 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of Three-dimensional Imaging on Implant Treatment Planning: Implant Diameter and Length. Dagassan-Berndt DC, Clemens W, Zitzmann NU, Schulze RK. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun 01; 19(6):704-711. PubMed ID: 29959300 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment. Angelopoulos C, Thomas SL, Hechler S, Parissis N, Hlavacek M. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct 01; 66(10):2130-5. PubMed ID: 18848113 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of digitalized panorama and cone beam computed tomographic image distortion for the diagnosis of dental implant surgery. Yim JH, Ryu DM, Lee BS, Kwon YD. J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar 01; 22(2):669-73. PubMed ID: 21415634 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Pre- and postoperative assessment of sinus grafting procedures using cone-beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiographs. Baciut M, Hedesiu M, Bran S, Jacobs R, Nackaerts O, Baciut G. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 May 01; 24(5):512-6. PubMed ID: 22220751 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical significance and variation of the advanced calcified stylohyoid complex detected by panoramic radiographs among 80-year-old subjects. Okabe S, Morimoto Y, Ansai T, Yamada K, Tanaka T, Awano S, Kito S, Takata Y, Takehara T, Ohba T. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 May 01; 35(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 16618854 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Presurgical evaluation of bony implant sites using panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography-influence of medical education. Dau M, Edalatpour A, Schulze R, Al-Nawas B, Alshihri A, Kämmerer PW. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Feb 01; 46(2):20160081. PubMed ID: 27759998 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Study of available bone for interforaminal implant treatment using cone-beam computed tomography. Madrigal C, Ortega R, Meniz C, López-Quiles J. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2008 May 01; 13(5):E307-12. PubMed ID: 18449115 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Implant-guided volumetric analysis of edentulous maxillary bone with cone-beam computerized tomography scan. Maxillary sinus pneumatization classification. Tolstunov L, Thai D, Arellano L. J Oral Implantol; 2012 Aug 01; 38(4):377-90. PubMed ID: 22913308 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Do CBCT scans alter surgical treatment plans? Comparison of preoperative surgical diagnosis using panoramic versus cone-beam CT images. Wolff C, Mücke T, Wagenpfeil S, Kanatas A, Bissinger O, Deppe H. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct 01; 44(10):1700-1705. PubMed ID: 27567358 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Incidental Findings in Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Dental Implants in 1002 Patients. Kachlan MO, Yang J, Balshi TJ, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi SF. J Prosthodont; 2021 Oct 01; 30(8):665-675. PubMed ID: 33433043 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The growth of Medicare rebatable cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in Australia. Brown LF, Monsour P. Aust Dent J; 2015 Dec 01; 60(4):511-9. PubMed ID: 25366248 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Is an elongated stylohyoid process prevalent in the elderly? A radiographic study in a Brazilian population. Rizzatti-Barbosa CM, Ribeiro MC, Silva-Concilio LR, Di Hipolito O, Ambrosano GM. Gerodontology; 2005 Jun 01; 22(2):112-5. PubMed ID: 15934355 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]