These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
244 related items for PubMed ID: 25040260
1. Alternate scoring of the Bayley-III improves prediction of performance on Griffiths Mental Development Scales before school entry in preschoolers with developmental concerns. Milne SL, McDonald JL, Comino EJ. Child Care Health Dev; 2015 Mar; 41(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 25040260 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development III with clinical populations: a preliminary exploration. Milne S, McDonald J, Comino EJ. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr; 2012 Feb; 32(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 21812743 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Griffiths-II and Bayley-II tests for the developmental assessment of high-risk infants. Cirelli I, Bickle Graz M, Tolsa JF. Infant Behav Dev; 2015 Nov; 41():17-25. PubMed ID: 26276119 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Neurodevelopmental outcome of extremely low birth weight infants at 24 months corrected age: a comparison between Griffiths and Bayley Scales. Picciolini O, Squarza C, Fontana C, Giannì ML, Cortinovis I, Gangi S, Gardon L, Presezzi G, Fumagalli M, Mosca F. BMC Pediatr; 2015 Sep 30; 15():139. PubMed ID: 26419231 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Concurrent validity of the Bayley-III and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-2. Connolly BH, McClune NO, Gatlin R. Pediatr Phys Ther; 2012 Sep 30; 24(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 22965209 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Developmental assessment of VLBW infants at 18 months of age: A comparison study between KSPD and Bayley III. Kono Y, Yonemoto N, Kusuda S, Hirano S, Iwata O, Tanaka K, Nakazawa J. Brain Dev; 2016 Apr 30; 38(4):377-85. PubMed ID: 26542468 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive and concurrent validity of standardized neurodevelopmental examinations by the Griffiths scales and Bayley scales of infant development II. Chaudhary T, Walch E, Herold B, Metze B, Lejeune A, Burkhardt F, Bührer C. Klin Padiatr; 2013 Jan 30; 225(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 23235928 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictive validity of the Bayley, Third Edition at 2 years for intelligence quotient at 4 years in preterm infants. Bode MM, DʼEugenio DB, Mettelman BB, Gross SJ. J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2014 Jan 30; 35(9):570-5. PubMed ID: 25370298 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Overestimating neurodevelopment using the Bayley-III after early complex cardiac surgery. Acton BV, Biggs WS, Creighton DE, Penner KA, Switzer HN, Thomas JH, Joffe AR, Robertson CM. Pediatrics; 2011 Oct 30; 128(4):e794-800. PubMed ID: 21949148 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Counterbalanced Comparison of the BSID-II and Bayley-III at Eighteen to Twenty-two Months Corrected Age. Sharp M, DeMauro SB. J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2017 Jun 30; 38(5):322-329. PubMed ID: 28538042 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing developmental delay in early childhood - concerns with the Bayley-III scales. Anderson PJ, Burnett A. Clin Neuropsychol; 2017 Feb 30; 31(2):371-381. PubMed ID: 27687612 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Children born extremely preterm show significant lower cognitive, language and motor function levels compared with children born at term, as measured by the Bayley-III at 2.5 years. Månsson J, Stjernqvist K. Acta Paediatr; 2014 May 30; 103(5):504-11. PubMed ID: 24494838 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the performance of healthy Australian 3-year-olds with the standardised norms of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (version-III). Chinta S, Walker K, Halliday R, Loughran-Fowlds A, Badawi N. Arch Dis Child; 2014 Jul 30; 99(7):621-4. PubMed ID: 24504506 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Early childhood neurodevelopmental outcome after open prenatal spina bifida aperta repair. Hepp ZS, Haas VM, Latal B, Meuli M, Möhrlen U, Schauer SM, Steinfeld R, Padden BA, Wille DA. Dev Med Child Neurol; 2021 Nov 30; 63(11):1302-1307. PubMed ID: 34296763 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Which Bayley-III cut-off values should be used in different developmental levels? Çelik P, Ayranci Sucakli I, Yakut HI. Turk J Med Sci; 2020 Jun 23; 50(4):764-770. PubMed ID: 31905494 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of 2-year-old children after early surgery for congenital heart disease on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition. Long SH, Galea MP, Eldridge BJ, Harris SR. Early Hum Dev; 2012 Aug 23; 88(8):603-7. PubMed ID: 22336496 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Concurrent Validity of the Bayley-III and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 at 18 Months. Gill K, Osiovich A, Synnes A, A Agnew J, Grunau RE, Miller SP, Zwicker JG. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr; 2019 Aug 23; 39(5):514-524. PubMed ID: 30541412 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Using the Bayley-III to assess neurodevelopmental delay: which cut-off should be used? Johnson S, Moore T, Marlow N. Pediatr Res; 2014 May 23; 75(5):670-4. PubMed ID: 24492622 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A psychometric study of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development - 3rd Edition for term and preterm Taiwanese infants. Yu YT, Hsieh WS, Hsu CH, Chen LC, Lee WT, Chiu NC, Wu YC, Jeng SF. Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Nov 23; 34(11):3875-83. PubMed ID: 24029804 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Underestimation of developmental delay by the new Bayley-III Scale. Anderson PJ, De Luca CR, Hutchinson E, Roberts G, Doyle LW, Victorian Infant Collaborative Group. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2010 Apr 23; 164(4):352-6. PubMed ID: 20368488 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]