These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

397 related items for PubMed ID: 25041224

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparative efficacy and safety of the Ambu(®) AuraOnce(™) laryngeal mask airway during general anaesthesia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Baidya DK, Chandralekha, Darlong V, Pandey R, Maitra S, Khanna P.
    Anaesthesia; 2014 Sep; 69(9):1023-32. PubMed ID: 24801012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A network meta-analysis of the clinical properties of various types of supraglottic airway device in children.
    Mihara T, Asakura A, Owada G, Yokoi A, Ka K, Goto T.
    Anaesthesia; 2017 Oct; 72(10):1251-1264. PubMed ID: 28737223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of the oropharyngeal leak pressure between three second generation supraglottic airway devices during laparoscopic surgery in pediatric patients.
    Kumar A, Sinha C, Kumar N, Kumar A, Kumar B, Kumar A, Kumar R.
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2022 Jul; 32(7):843-850. PubMed ID: 35338764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Randomized crossover comparison of the proseal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients.
    Cook TM, Nolan JP, Verghese C, Strube PJ, Lees M, Millar JM, Baskett PJ.
    Br J Anaesth; 2002 Apr; 88(4):527-33. PubMed ID: 12066729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Randomized crossover study assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure and fiber optic positioning : Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ versus Laryngeal Tube LTS II™ size 2 in non-paralyzed anesthetized children.
    Gasteiger L, Ofner S, Stögermüller B, Ziegler B, Brimacombe J, Keller C.
    Anaesthesist; 2016 Aug; 65(8):585-9. PubMed ID: 27380049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.