These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

175 related items for PubMed ID: 25057094

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Force transmission of one- and two-piece morse-taper oral implants: a nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Cehreli MC, Akça K, Iplikçioğlu H.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 15248884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Biomechanical Analysis of Implant-Supported Prostheses with Different Implant-Abutment Connections.
    Dayrell AC, Noritomi PY, Takahashi JM, Consani RL, Mesquita MF, dos Santos MB.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015 Aug; 28(6):621-3. PubMed ID: 26523723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of vertical interarch space and abutment height on stress distributions: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Naveau A, Renault P, Pierrisnard L.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2009 Jun; 17(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 19645311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Efficiency considerations for the purely tapered interference fit (TIF) abutments used in dental implants.
    Bozkaya D, Müftü S.
    J Biomech Eng; 2004 Aug; 126(4):393-401. PubMed ID: 15543856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Assunção WG, Gomes EA, Rocha EP, Delben JA.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011 Aug; 26(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 21841989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Compressive resistance of abutments with different diameters and transmucosal heights in Morse-taper implants.
    Lillo R, Parra C, Fuentes R, Borie E, Engelke W, Beltrán V.
    Braz Dent J; 2015 Aug; 26(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 25831107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Photoelastic analysis of cemented or screwed implant-supported prostheses with different prosthetic connections.
    Tonella BP, Pellizzer EP, Ferraço R, Falcón-Antenucci RM, Carvalho PS, Goiato MC.
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 21851260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Retention System and Splinting on Morse Taper Implants in the Posterior Maxilla by 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Lemos CAA, Verri FR, Santiago JF, Almeida DAF, Batista VES, Noritomi PY, Pellizzer DP.
    Braz Dent J; 2018 Aug; 29(1):30-35. PubMed ID: 29267521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of internal hexagonal index on removal torque and tensile removal force of different Morse taper connection abutments.
    de Oliveira Silva TS, Mendes Alencar SM, da Silva Valente V, de Moura CDVS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):621-627. PubMed ID: 27881313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A comparison of stress and strain distribution characteristics of two different rigid implant designs for distal-extension fixed prostheses.
    Akpinar I, Demirel F, Parnas L, Sahin S.
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Jan; 27(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9063207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.