These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

124 related items for PubMed ID: 25069587

  • 1. Proposed method for predicting pair matching of skeletal elements allows too many false rejections.
    Vickers S, Lubinski PM, Henebry DeLeon L, Bowen JT.
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60(1):102-6. PubMed ID: 25069587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Tables for the metric evaluation of pair-matching of human skeletal elements.
    Thomas RM, Ubelaker DH, Byrd JE.
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jul; 58(4):952-6. PubMed ID: 23682771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The Power of Exclusion using Automated Osteometric Sorting: Pair-Matching.
    Lynch JJ, Byrd J, LeGarde CB.
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Mar; 63(2):371-380. PubMed ID: 28547802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Osteometric sorting of skeletal elements from a sample of modern Colombians: a pilot study.
    Rodríguez JM, Hackman L, Martínez W, Medina CS.
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Mar; 130(2):541-50. PubMed ID: 25588668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Osteometric sorting of commingled human remains.
    Byrd JE, Adams BJ.
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Jul; 48(4):717-24. PubMed ID: 12877285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Advances in Osteometric Sorting: Utilizing Diaphyseal CSG Properties for Lower Limb Skeletal Pair-Matching.
    Bertsatos A, Chovalopoulou ME.
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Sep; 65(5):1400-1405. PubMed ID: 32569430
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Multimethod Resolution of a Small-Scale Case of Commingling.
    Finlayson JE, Bartelink EJ, Perrone A, Dalton K.
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Mar; 62(2):493-497. PubMed ID: 27864949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Estimation of the most likely number of individuals from commingled human skeletal remains.
    Adams BJ, Konigsberg LW.
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2004 Oct; 125(2):138-51. PubMed ID: 15365980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Next-generation osteometric sorting: Using 3D shape, elliptical Fourier analysis, and Hausdorff distance to optimize osteological pair-matching.
    Fancourt HSM, Lynch JJ, Byrd JE, Stephan CN.
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 May; 66(3):821-836. PubMed ID: 33550609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Simple algorithms for the estimation of the initial number of individuals in commingled skeletal remains.
    Nikita E, Lahr MM.
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2011 Dec; 146(4):629-36. PubMed ID: 21989995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.