These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


822 related items for PubMed ID: 25072236

  • 1. Unilateral cochlear implant use promotes normal-like loudness perception in adolescents with childhood deafness.
    Steel MM, Abbasalipour P, Salloum CA, Hasek D, Papsin BC, Gordon KA.
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):e291-301. PubMed ID: 25072236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant.
    Jeon EK, Brown CJ, Etler CP, O'Brien S, Chiou LK, Abbas PJ.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 20085196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evoked stapedius reflex and compound action potential thresholds versus most comfortable loudness level: assessment of their relation for charge-based fitting strategies in implant users.
    Walkowiak A, Lorens A, Polak M, Kostek B, Skarzynski H, Szkielkowska A, Skarzynski PH.
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2011 Jan; 73(4):189-95. PubMed ID: 21659787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Multicentre investigation on electrically evoked compound action potential and stapedius reflex: how do these objective measures relate to implant programming parameters?
    Van Den Abbeele T, Noël-Petroff N, Akin I, Caner G, Olgun L, Guiraud J, Truy E, Attias J, Raveh E, Belgin E, Sennaroglu G, Basta D, Ernst A, Martini A, Rosignoli M, Levi H, Elidan J, Benghalem A, Amstutz-Montadert I, Lerosey Y, De Vel E, Dhooge I, Hildesheimer M, Kronenberg J, Arnold L.
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 Feb; 13(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 22340749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies.
    Han DM, Chen XQ, Zhao XT, Kong Y, Li YX, Liu S, Liu B, Mo LY.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evolution of cochlear implant arrays result in changes in behavioral and physiological responses in children.
    Gordin A, Papsin B, James A, Gordon K.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):908-15. PubMed ID: 19730148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
    Potts LG, Skinner MW, Gotter BD, Strube MJ, Brenner CA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The relationship between the intraoperative ECAP threshold and postoperative behavioral levels: the difference between postlingually deafened adults and prelingually deafened pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Morita T, Naito Y, Hirai T, Yamaguchi S, Ito J.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2003 Feb; 260(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 12582781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Cochlear implantees: Analysis of behavioral and objective measures for a clinical population of various age groups.
    Greisiger R, Shallop JK, Hol PK, Elle OJ, Jablonski GE.
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Feb; 16 Suppl 4():1-19. PubMed ID: 26642899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Post-operative stapedius reflex tests with simultaneous loudness scaling in patients supplied with cochlear implants.
    Stephan K, Welzl-Müller K.
    Audiology; 2000 Feb; 39(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 10749066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Correlation between electrically-induced stapedius reflex and discomfort threshold in cochlear implant patients].
    Gattaz G, Battmer RD, Lehnhardt E, Gnadeberg D.
    HNO; 1992 Dec; 40(12):480-3. PubMed ID: 1493968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
    Thai-Van H, Cozma S, Boutitie F, Disant F, Truy E, Collet L.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measures.
    Firszt JB, Chambers And RD, Kraus N.
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):516-31. PubMed ID: 12476089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Brain stem responses evoked by stimulation of the mature cochlear nucleus with an auditory brain stem implant.
    O'Driscoll M, El-Deredy W, Ramsden RT.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Dec; 32(3):286-99. PubMed ID: 21157353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 42.