These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
301 related items for PubMed ID: 25088680
1. The risk of uterine rupture is not increased with single- compared with double-layer closure: a Swedish cohort study. Hesselman S, Högberg U, Ekholm-Selling K, Råssjö EB, Jonsson M. BJOG; 2015 Oct; 122(11):1535-41. PubMed ID: 25088680 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk factors for uterine rupture and neonatal consequences of uterine rupture: a population-based study of successive pregnancies in Sweden. Kaczmarczyk M, Sparén P, Terry P, Cnattingius S. BJOG; 2007 Oct; 114(10):1208-14. PubMed ID: 17877673 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting cesarean section and uterine rupture among women attempting vaginal birth after prior cesarean section. Smith GC, White IR, Pell JP, Dobbie R. PLoS Med; 2005 Sep; 2(9):e252. PubMed ID: 16146414 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes of trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery among women with fetuses weighing >4000 g. Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Cohen A, Lieberman E. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):903-5. PubMed ID: 11641675 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Time matters-a Swedish cohort study of labor duration and risk of uterine rupture. Hesselman S, Lampa E, Wikman A, Törn AE, Högberg U, Wikström AK, Jonsson M. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Oct; 100(10):1902-1909. PubMed ID: 34114644 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of uterine closure in the risk of uterine rupture. Bujold E, Goyet M, Marcoux S, Brassard N, Cormier B, Hamilton E, Abdous B, Sidi EAL, Kinch R, Miner L, Masse A, Fortin C, Gagné GP, Fortier A, Bastien G, Sabbah R, Guimond P, Roberge S, Gauthier RJ. Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 116(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 20567166 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section. Kayani SI, Alfirevic Z. BJOG; 2005 Apr; 112(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 15777443 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, Hauth JC, Bloom SL, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, Carpenter M, Peaceman AM, O'sullivan MJ, Sibai BM, Langer O, Thorp JM, Ramin SM, Mercer BM, Gabbe SG, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jul; 108(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 16816050 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery. Studsgaard A, Skorstengaard M, Glavind J, Hvidman L, Uldbjerg N. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Nov; 92(11):1256-63. PubMed ID: 23962339 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Previous preterm cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture in subsequent trial of labor-a national cohort study. Mantel Ä, Ajne G, Lindblad Wollmann C, Stephansson O. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 224(4):380.e1-380.e13. PubMed ID: 33002499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk of maternal and neonatal complications in subsequent pregnancy after planned caesarean section in a first birth, compared with emergency caesarean section: a nationwide comparative cohort study. Kok N, Ruiter L, Hof M, Ravelli A, Mol BW, Pajkrt E, Kazemier B. BJOG; 2014 Jan; 121(2):216-23. PubMed ID: 24373595 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors predisposing to perinatal death related to uterine rupture during attempted vaginal birth after caesarean section: retrospective cohort study. Smith GC, Pell JP, Pasupathy D, Dobbie R. BMJ; 2004 Aug 14; 329(7462):375. PubMed ID: 15262772 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Sentilhes L, Vayssière C, Beucher G, Deneux-Tharaux C, Deruelle P, Diemunsch P, Gallot D, Haumonté JB, Heimann S, Kayem G, Lopez E, Parant O, Schmitz T, Sellier Y, Rozenberg P, d'Ercole C. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Sep 14; 170(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 23810846 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of previous vaginal delivery on the risk of uterine rupture during a subsequent trial of labor. Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Cohen A, Lieberman E. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov 14; 183(5):1184-6. PubMed ID: 11084564 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Rupture of the scarred uterus. Grossetti E, Vardon D, Creveuil C, Herlicoviez M, Dreyfus M. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007 Nov 14; 86(5):572-8. PubMed ID: 17464586 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Induction of labor: comparison of a cohort with uterine scar from previous cesarean section vs. a cohort with intact uterus. Locatelli A, Ghidini A, Ciriello E, Incerti M, Bonardi C, Regalia AL. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Aug 14; 19(8):471-5. PubMed ID: 16966111 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Trial of labor and vaginal birth after cesarean section in patients with uterine Müllerian anomalies: a population-based study. Erez O, Dukler D, Novack L, Rozen A, Zolotnik L, Bashiri A, Koifman A, Mazor M. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun 14; 196(6):537.e1-11. PubMed ID: 17547885 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting uterine rupture in women undergoing trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. Landon MB. Semin Perinatol; 2010 Aug 14; 34(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 20654777 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk factors for complete uterine rupture. Al-Zirqi I, Daltveit AK, Forsén L, Stray-Pedersen B, Vangen S. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb 14; 216(2):165.e1-165.e8. PubMed ID: 27780708 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next pregnancy. Vachon-Marceau C, Demers S, Bujold E, Roberge S, Gauthier RJ, Pasquier JC, Girard M, Chaillet N, Boulvain M, Jastrow N. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul 14; 217(1):65.e1-65.e5. PubMed ID: 28263751 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]