These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


254 related items for PubMed ID: 25106718

  • 1. Single-incision versus three-port laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Xu AM, Huang L, Li TJ.
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Apr; 29(4):822-43. PubMed ID: 25106718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Single-incision versus conventional three-incision laparoscopic appendectomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Deng L, Xiong J, Xia Q.
    J Evid Based Med; 2017 Aug; 10(3):196-206. PubMed ID: 28276643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Single-incision appendectomy is comparable to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review and pooled analysis.
    Gill RS, Shi X, Al-Adra DP, Birch DW, Karmali S.
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2012 Aug; 22(4):319-27. PubMed ID: 22874680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Single-incision versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Chen JM, Geng W, Xie SX, Liu FB, Zhao YJ, Yu LQ, Geng XP.
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2015 Aug; 24(4):195-203. PubMed ID: 25600865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in children.
    Zhang Z, Wang Y, Liu R, Zhao L, Liu H, Zhang J, Li G.
    J Pediatr Surg; 2015 Sep; 50(9):1600-9. PubMed ID: 26095165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing single incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.
    Clerveus M, Morandeira-Rivas A, Moreno-Sanz C, Herrero-Bogajo ML, Picazo-Yeste JS, Tadeo-Ruiz G.
    World J Surg; 2014 Aug; 38(8):1937-46. PubMed ID: 24682257
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Intra-/Extracorporeal Single-Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Fujii T, Tanaka A, Katami H, Shimono R.
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2022 Jun; 32(6):702-712. PubMed ID: 35443815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Single-Incision Versus Three-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.
    Vellei S, Borri A.
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Aug; 27(8):804-811. PubMed ID: 28402744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.